Don't really find it evil, but I would've preferred you left this one vague. I'll try this line the next time I'm up at 2am comforting my wife because she's woken up crying (again!) because we are medically unable to conceive and don't have the thousands of dollars lying around for adoption. Don't think it'll work though.2. I'm pro-choice.
This will come off as evil, but I really think the world has enough babies. Social services in this country, are understaffed and underfunded. I've heard way too many stories of people working for child protection services not caring about a foster child in a bad home, simply because there just aren't enough resources or that the staff member in charge is just overwhelmed with cases. If someone doesn't want to have a baby, abort it, because there is a good chance that child will be born into an unwelcome home and become a financial liability for the rest of us for some time.
I'm a liberal, too.
Which is why I'm conservative.
Remember, in today's world: liberal = leftist
The "real" definition of liberalism is what one needs reminding of. Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd also like to add that I find it strange that someone who's an espoused gun-owner would purposefully and willfully support a person and a party that is, almost to a man (leadership-wise), completely and totally against personal firearm ownership and use? Does not compute.
-J-
I'm a liberal, too.
Which is why I'm conservative.
Remember, in today's world: liberal = leftist
The "real" definition of liberalism is what one needs reminding of. Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd also like to add that I find it strange that someone who's an espoused gun-owner would purposefully and willfully support a person and a party that is, almost to a man (leadership-wise), completely and totally against personal firearm ownership and use? Does not compute.
-J-
And just to prove an earlier poster right, I'll say something anti-gun. I can understand why the government won't allow fully automatic weapons and extended capacity magazines. From what I've gathered, if you need more than 10 rounds per magazine, either you're in a war zone or you need to go back to the range and practice. I do fully appreciate the fact that we are unique in our freedoms to own firearms and while me and my pistols might do anything against a government ordered military strike, it does instill some fear with those in power, which is always healthy.
Don't really find it evil, but I would've preferred you left this one vague. I'll try this line the next time I'm up at 2am comforting my wife because she's woken up crying (again!) because we are medically unable to conceive and don't have the thousands of dollars lying around for adoption. Don't think it'll work though.
...intelligent people's opinions change when they're presented with intelligent arguments.
Don't really find it evil, but I would've preferred you left this one vague. I'll try this line the next time I'm up at 2am comforting my wife because she's woken up crying (again!) because we are medically unable to conceive and don't have the thousands of dollars lying around for adoption. Don't think it'll work though.
I'm thinking you don't understand the meaning & purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
The right to keep & bear ARMS. Arms are weapons. It doesn't say single-shot rifles. It doesn't say knives. It says ARMS. Arms are what our military has. Constitutionally, we have the right to keep & bear any arms which could be feasibly used to protect our lives & property, at a minimum. If you own 4,000 acres, this could mean anything up to & including a tank or armed helicopter, imo. If you believe this is an unreasonable viewpoint, then you don't understand our history.
*EDIT* removed 'should' in reference to our rights.
i have 400+ acres what do i qualify for???the land is pread out all over the state. i hope i qualify for a tank (awesome yote killer)