There are also studies which show the opposite. When seeing conflicting information we can choose to believe the information that supports our belief. There’s really no room for disparaging that. It’s the default human instinct. We can also override that instinct, to say it could be either.Well, there are studies that have found that the vaccinated cary a higher viral load than the unvaccinated, so I don't think you can make that claim. Higher viral load would mean more infectious.
I think that what the two different outcomes tell me, is that the vaccines are at least a little effective against the delta variant. I understand that goes against what many skeptics believe, that it has zero benefit.
But if we’re all being honest I think the thing that both sides should be able to admit, the fact that there is conflicting data should eliminate any talk of mandates. Even INGO’s chamber-o-commerce Republicans should admit that beyond just lip service.