Public or private?
Some of both. What difference does that make? The mob doesn't respect private property any more than public. They are intent on erasing American history and have no right to destroy.
Public or private?
Couldn't do a simple search? Here are locations of Lenin statues in America:
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Seattle
- New York City
- Hutchinson, Kansas
- Willimantic, Connecticut
Nice. Way to bury the lede on these.
Some of both. What difference does that make? The mob doesn't respect private property any more than public. They are intent on destroying American history and have no right to destroy.
No lede buried. I wanted to see if you could actually do your own search.
As for what the mob does, that they do horrible things is not justification to do likewise. There is a process. It should be followed.
Uh huh. Try to sell that to.....anyone.
No lede buried. I wanted to see if you could actually do your own search.
Why are there Lenin statues in America anyway?
As shown, most are either in a museum, or part of some themed restaurant. (wasn't there one in Wayne World 2, or something?)
Seattle's is in a hippie-dippie part of town.
Hence, there's really only one, thus nullifying Phase2's assertion. (Maybe his whole claim was just a test. )
I figured you'd like the people rising up and tearing down these edifices of the state. Power to the people, down with evil government, and all that.
Well, you are a lawyer after all.Yeah...I said something like that...but a lot more long-winded.
I saw an article on FB. Apparently he saw a serpentine belt... are we to believe that he doesnt know the difference in a belt and a noose...
ETA: that is now fake news, maybe...
https://heavy.com/sports/2020/06/bubba-wallace-serpentine-belt-noose-nascar-hoax/
I will never understand why, when articles contain screen shots of tweets or other social media posts, that they feel the need to then quote what is clearly visible in the screen shot. Either just show the screen shot, or quote it. No need to say the same thing twice. And they all do it, no matter what the news source.
Probably the same reason every news story has to have either a relevant photo or a file photo.
...or so it is searchable.
This makes sense. But then, just quote the tweet or post and leave the screen shot out of it.
Signed,
The Department of Redundancy Department
I will never understand why, when articles contain screen shots of tweets or other social media posts, that they feel the need to then quote what is clearly visible in the screen shot. Either just show the screen shot, or quote it. No need to say the same thing twice. And they all do it, no matter what the news source.