...Allegedly, one of his crew members found a "noose" hanging in his garage yesterday morning. As it turns out, it was almost certainly at best a misunderstanding, but more likely an intentional misunderstanding, if not a hoax.
The "noose"? Near-100% certainty that it was nothing more than a manual garage door pull rope with hand loop, that is installed on every bay door in the garage.
It's somewhat telling that we've seen no pics of the offending "noose". You'd think something would have leaked out by now.
FWIW:
[video=youtube_share;l7o4A16QCxE]http://youtu.be/l7o4A16QCxE[/video]
I saw an article on FB. Apparently he saw a serpentine belt... are we to believe that he doesnt know the difference in a belt and a noose...It's somewhat telling that we've seen no pics of the offending "noose". You'd think something would have leaked out by now.
I saw an article on FB. Apparently he saw a serpentine belt... are we to believe that he doesnt know the difference in a belt and a noose...
Why you should care about the statues coming down. A Veneuelan American talks about their revolution (1 min video).
https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/status/1275289669454966784
The lack of a picture is....interesting, but serpentine belt? No.
Chip's explanation makes more sense, but I don't have enough evidence to reach a conclusion.
Statues of US founders being torn down is alarming. Statues of Southern figures from the Civil War erected in the 1920s I care less about if the community is pretty united in moving past that. If it's a small number of people with oversized platforms to incrementally tear down all of American history, that's back into alarm territory. I guess some things are easier to problematize than others.
Here's my take.
1) No mob tearing something down is acceptable. That is lawlessness. We need to separate the mob craziness from the issue of whether a certain statue should remain up. To protest a statue, petition to have it removed, speak out at meetings, contact local officials? All good. Riots and mobs taking the matter into their own hands? No.
2a) Why was the statue erected? If it was remember positive contributions a person made to the community, leave it up even if the person was not perfect. For example:
- George Washington- the statues are for the role he played in the revolution, the founding of the country and his presidency. He was a slave owner, but I am unaware of any statue built to honor this. Leave it up.
- Thomas Jefferson- the statues honor the writing of the Declaration of Independence, his presidency, etc. They are not because he owned slaves.
- Christopher Columbus- we make jokes about him being lost, but he was an explorer who opened up the Western Hemisphere to Europe. Some people don't like that, but I would urge them to not build a statue for him. He has never been honored for genocide or slavery or whatever terms they want to apply to him.
2b) Why was the statue erected? If the main reason the statue was erected was to honor a contribution to something not worthy of honor, perhaps it should come down, but through a lawful process. Let's face it, the "but for cause" of the "Confederacy" was to maintain the institution of slavery. Sure, there were other issues involved, but slavery was at the center of all of it. I trust those who wrote the "Confederate" constitution on this. No later revisionist "lost cause" advocates trying to transform a sow's ear of a cause into a valiant silk purse will change that. I have no issue with the local leaders taking them down if it is the will of their constituents.
There is not binary. As with everything humans touch, there is nuance because humans are fraught with imperfections and flaws or all types. If we only leave the statues of perfect people up....well:
Apparently it's not enough just to tear down statues. You have to lynch them too.
https://www.koin.com/news/protests/protesters-hang-confederate-statue-from-post-in-raleigh/
The lack of a picture is....interesting, but serpentine belt? No.
Chip's explanation makes more sense, but I don't have enough evidence to reach a conclusion.
It appears so. You'd think the mob would tire of assuming so much and nearly always being wrong about it. Then again, many people still believe "hands up don't shoot" was real rather than a lie.
Why would they? The mob doesn't care about the truth or reality, they only care about the goal. The end justifies the means and the end is control.
That easily happens when the lie is a page one headline and the retraction is a tiny blurb on page 13 and slow in coming.