Clinton child sex ring

[IndyDave1776]

I don't think this thing named Epstein would even be dragged back into court now unless there was some huge reason involving international politics.

Definitely. Either someone thinks Trump actually participated and can be impeached or they think they can do enough damage in the court of public opinion by introducing Mueller 2.0 timed so that it won't be resolved by the next election to win by way of the low road, and apparently Billy Jeff has outlived his usefulness to his owners such that they are willing to throw him under the bus to get Trump.

 

[Kutnupe14]

So will you be abstaining in 2020 or following your pop’s lead?

I'll be voting against Trump for whomever has the best chance to beat him.
#FlyingMeteor2020

 

[Mongo59]

I'll be voting against Trump for whomever has the best chance to beat him.
#FlyingMeteor2020

#Besthandjob2020?

 

[Expat]

Agreed. We could be in for either the housecleaning of the century or else a cover-up so huge and flagrant they don't even try to hide it, just make sure no prosecutable evidence finds its way to the authorities official hands--far more flagrant than previous examples of people named Clinton thumbing their noses at the law.

It seems like they have normalized the rich and powerful not being held accountable for anything they do. How many stories have we seen in recent years where some rich kid was let off of serious charges because he came from a good family. What have we done about it. Nothing. We just shake our heads and go on with life. I read a book over 20 years ago that referenced the child sex trafficking that goes on in this country. I was outraged and wondered how we could allow something so evil to go on. I think the answer is obvious. Our masters are okay with it.

 

[jedi]

I have not accused anyone, but I feel that Pelosi's daughter's tweet is telling.

Do the Pelosi's have any Republican friends?

Do you think Trump is one of her faves?

?? what did the twert say

 

[d.kaufman]

Knowing what I know now? Clinton.

Pretty much figured you'd avoid an honest answer. I"ll just go with you're a "Feel the Burn" kinda guy and will be voting for Socialism in 2020

 

[ArcadiaGP]

why is this thread about trump 2020 now

 

[T.Lex]

why is this thread about trump 2020 now

Actually, it looks like it is another Trump 2016 thread. Seems like that's what most of them become.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Pretty much figured you'd avoid an honest answer. I"ll just go with you're a "Feel the Burn" kinda guy and will be voting for Socialism in 2020

I'm sorry, I misunderstood. Talking about the upcoming election, that's easy; Biden ALL day long.

 

[NKBJ]

Saw the report that wikipedia has Epstein's bio altered to drop mention of Clinton and Spacey and add Trump.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Saw the report that wikipedia has Epstein's bio altered to drop mention of Clinton and Spacey and add Trump.

Big surprise. Funny how that works, isn't it?

 

[KG1]

I'll be voting against Trump for whomever has the best chance to beat him.
#FlyingMeteor2020

Fair enough. I would readily admit there is enough merit for some legitimate (key word)criticism and people from all sides disagree with Trump and that’s their prerogative.

I just wanna see those differences settled through the ballot box and not some nonsense such as pushing for impeachment to get rid of a duly elected POTUS from the get go just because they don’t like Trump.

 

[jedi]

Saw the report that wikipedia has Epstein's bio altered to drop mention of Clinton and Spacey and add Trump.

newspeak comrades!
the article had misprints in it due to using the oldspeak language which the rectify has taken care of.

 

[JettaKnight]

Saw the report that wikipedia has Epstein's bio altered to drop mention of Clinton and Spacey and add Trump.

Here's the change: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jeffrey_Epstein&diff=905646832&oldid=905646549

That page has been changing every couple of minutes, so I'm too busy to dig into when that info was added and why. Wikipedia does have a very high bar to clear when it comes to adding such facts about living persons. The NPOV is paramount.

Maybe there's something thing in the "talk" about it.


You know, if you don't like it, you could change it back... anyone can edit Wikipedia... but expect some resistance and be able to argue why it should be there.

 

[BugI02]

why is this thread about trump 2020 now

Because we're once again watching the MSM, in real time, bypass all other aspects of the story (such as 26 trips to the island, five after ditching his SS detail) and try to use something Trump said in 2002 as a bridge to somehow work in Trump's guilt by association. And some members have, reliably, tried to parrot this line of reasoning on INGO

We're seeing the usual troll stir the pot, and people who recognize the game (as its being played) play their own game which involves trying to pin down ... this person ... on something, anything that he can later be required to own up to rather than prevaricate. Think of the activity as being like golf, the expectation of success is not required to derive some enjoyment from the activity

Edit:For the 'resistance' everything is about Trump

 

[ArcadiaGP]

A new accuser has come forward to say that Epstein raped her in his NY apartment when she was 15

 

[Expat]

A new accuser has come forward to say that Epstein raped her in his NY apartment when she was 15

I think she was on the Today Show this morning. Sad story if true.

 

[ultra...good]

Saw the report that wikipedia has Epstein's bio altered to drop mention of Clinton and Spacey and add Trump.

Last night on CBS world propaganda (news) the entire piece regarding Epstein was all about Trump and Acosta. Barely anything about Epstein.

Few years back, talking with a friend and the age of consent came up. He tells me I would be surprised that about half the states the age of consent was less then 18. I was surprised to see how many and how low the age is. Take a look:
https://www.ageofconsent.net/states

So with all of this stuff going on now, I had to look and see what the age of consent was for the rest of the world. That is even more disgusting. I am surprised.
https://www.ageofconsent.net/world

Also surprised to see Bahrain. 21?

 

[indiucky]

 

[2A_Tom]

?? what did the twert say

https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...143-clinton-child-sex-ring-7.html#post7969702

Pelosi is signaling her followers that it’s “likely” that certain politicians, influence peddlers, academicians, and business leaders she likes are going to be outed by Epstein’s arrest?
Why would she say that unless she had prior suspicions? And, if she did, why did this self-proclaimed feminist and protector of innocent little girls (boys?) remain silent.

Pelosi is signaling her followers that it’s “likely” that certain politicians, influence peddlers, academicians, and business leaders she likes are going to be outed by Epstein’s arrest?
Why would she say that unless she had prior suspicions? And, if she did, why did this self-proclaimed feminist and protector of innocent little girls (boys?) remain silent.