I read but I can not link, that at the turn of the last century, The "Progressive party" was tied to the Soviet communist party. Therefore the word progressive was dropped in favor of liberal, which is now viewed as a bad word so they have begun using progressive without thr former stigma.
I would argue that the whackadoodles aren't the problem. They are simply the numerical mass. It is the truly evil individuals who are steering these idiots who are the true problem. The whackadoodles are enables, as are the Fudds.
I'm confused...all this code language. Should I be hearing dog whistles or anything?
Maybe definitions are in order:
Whackadoodle: A crazy progressively left person who wants to progress the world into a socialist utopia. They tend to regard feelings as a form of factual information.
Fudd: A "gun owner" who just wants to protect their right to hunt, but does not see the 2A much beyond that. They tend to be "establishment" conservatives.
Maybe definitions are in order:
Whackadoodle: A crazy progressively left person who wants to progress the world into a socialist utopia. They tend to regard feelings as a form of factual information.
Fudd: A "gun owner" who just wants to protect their right to hunt, but does not see the 2A much beyond that. They tend to be "establishment" conservatives.
Oh ok. So my tinnitus is just acting up again.... whew!
But I thought John McCain defined whackadoodles as folks like Cruz and Paul that are more constitutional minded. (Or maybe that was whackobirds?)
As in Elmer Fudd? I guess not to be confused with FUD - Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt - the thing that drives Pmags to $100 each.
Maybe definitions are in order:
Whackadoodle: A crazy progressively left person who wants to progress the world into a socialist utopia. They tend to regard feelings as a form of factual information.
Fudd: A "gun owner" who just wants to protect their right to hunt, but does not see the 2A much beyond that. They tend to be "establishment" conservatives.
Same goes for John McCain. **** him too.
No one wants to take you guns... but we should look at what Australia did, and here is a law that will ban every common semi automatic weapon in existence
The Founding Fathers only meant you could have muskets. All firearms should have biometric locks
The slippery slope doesn't exist.... but the bullet buttons, magazine limits, list of approved handguns, and "assault weapon" features laws didn't work so we're going to roll out even more "common sense gun control laws"
Prohibition doesn't work, end the War on Drugs. All guns should be outlawed.
Asking for ID to vote violates a Constitutional right and disenfranchises minorities. Gun owners should be finger printed, monitored, have mental health evaluations, pay for licenses, pay for training, and be subject to raids by police at any time.
Gun owners are violent psychopaths just looking for an excuse to kill. We should SWAT them/attack them on sight/send in the troops.
No one needs a weapon that the military uses. Of course people can own shotguns and bolt action rifles.
Neither the time nor the crayons...sometimes it just plain sucks to be out of rep!
This site needs a "LIKE" button...'nough said!!!
Ditto.
Now this would be a great t-shirt!
For all interested, I have repped OakRiver the maximum points I had. Others should do so ASAP. That's a great image, and I am stealing it, reducing it's size, and saving it to photobucket for later use.
That is all.
Blessings,
Bill
Much obliged, thank you very much.For all interested, I have repped OakRiver the maximum points I had. Others should do so ASAP. That's a great image, and I am stealing it, reducing it's size, and saving it to photobucket for later use.
That is all.
Blessings,
Bill
Much obliged, thank you very much.
Love the updated version too