What the CEC does kinda matter because it drives state policies and private sector policies.I don't recall anything the government has done that forces me to wear a mask.
It's all on the private sector.
So what the CDC says doesn't really matter.
Story doesn't match the headline. Color me surprised.CDC Quietly Admits The Death Toll From COVID Vaccines Is Greater Than Every Vaccine In The Last 20 Years COMBINED
Are you one of those people hesitant to receive a COVID-19 vaccine? You know, one of those "dangerous" and "selfish" people, as the Democrats would call you, wen-volve.com
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) posted data which shows that more people have died after receiving a COVID vaccine than for all other vaccines of the last 20 years combined.
What the CEC does kinda matter because it drives state policies and private sector policies.
I'm sure this has been posted here, but I'll reiterate: there has not been one, single documented case of Covid transmission from casual, outdoor contact. Not one. (Regardless of how much people are "spitting" from merely breathing.)
It smells to me like this new change is more about 0biden hitting his promised vaccinated rate by 7/4.I would feel completely vindicated in the very consistent position I have taken over the past 15 months, given CDC's recent proclamation - if I had any faith that CDC won't (once again) contradict itself with a new proclamation next week.
Wearing masks outdoors has never been about any science. There has never been any science to support the practice. It has always been about control and social engineering.
If it could be documented, I suspect it would only be via fluid swapping, boot bumping, prolonged extremely close contact in the great outdoorsAre you suggesting outdoor transmission has never happened? I wouldn't go that far. I believe it is comparatively rare but I find it highly likely that it has indeed happened.
The technicalities of the transmission being "documented" and the contact being "casual" probably make the statement true but misleading.
This is pretty much where we are now...
If it could be documented, I suspect it would only be via fluid swapping, boot bumping, prolonged extremely close contact in the great outdoors
How common must it be to be significant rather than a curiosity? I believe people have been struck by falling airplane parts or ice chunk buildups, too - but we didn't mandate a change to construction standards because of it
I would need to see the parameters that study used to conclude definitive outdoor transmission. A study done by the South Koreans, who had rigorous and intrusive contact tracing in place prior to the study as well as high quality testing for positivity, found that out of 407 patients testing positive for WuVid, 406 caught the disease from indoor exposure to others already infected. The one remaining case could not be definitively attributed to an outdoor exposure but it could not be ruled out
I'd bet that a large crowd of people trying to mob traffic. Maybe large mobs of people throwing firebombs at federal buildings. Maybe large mobs of people breaking into department stores looting. Basically large mobs of people outdoors in close proximity to one another might tend to spread covid. Unless you're doing all that stuff to protest police brutality. Then yer good. zero chance of spread.If it could be documented, I suspect it would only be via fluid swapping, boot bumping, prolonged extremely close contact in the great outdoors
How common must it be to be significant rather than a curiosity? I believe people have been struck by falling airplane parts or ice chunk buildups, too - but we didn't mandate a change to construction standards because of it