The Great Reset (Orchestrated Culling of the Herd, Financial Chaos, Social Chaos, Military Neutralization, Food and Energy Production Destruction)

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,073
    149
    Indiana
    "In her speech, she notes that we cannot allow free speech to get into the way of fighting things like climate change. She notes that they cannot win the war on climate change if people do not believe them about the underlying problem. The solution is to silence those with opposing views. It is that simple."
    In her latest attack on free speech, Ardern declared free speech as a virtual weapon of war.

    She is demanding that the world join her in battling free speech as part of its own war against “misinformation” and “disinformation.”

    More about her UN podium speech at the link...but in short she got quite a bit of applause for her encouraging countries,corporations,and in general censoring anyone with an opposing view.

    Oh,and Harvard immediately gave her a fellowship(within hours).

    Free speech is now viewed as a weapon of war by the lunatics.

     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,073
    149
    Indiana
    Telling others at the UN...yea this **** is not going to end well.


    Where the evidence shows a community is likely to be wiped out in as few as 10 years, that poses an “intolerable level of risk” to the community’s safety or its continued viability. “The only rational response, in the absence of a feasible, cost-effective alternative, will be to relocate the community to a safer place.”
    And you thought you owned your home and as such had a right to its use. No, you peasant.

    Then they have this…

    Although most instances of community relocation to date have occurred after a natural disaster, the working group report says, in the future pre-emptive relocation will become increasingly necessary. “Such action can permanently mitigate the risk faced by threatened communities and allow local and central government to exit an increasingly expensive cycle of responding to, and recovering from, destructive storms and similar harmful events.

     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    112,987
    149
    Southside Indy

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    31,586
    113
    North Central
    Great read, lots of interesting connections…

    “The powerful players in global health are not elected governments, but three private foundations: the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Among these, the Rockefeller Foundation, endowed with $5 billion, is by far the smallest, but also the oldest of the three. The Gates Foundation has an endowment of $40 billion US dollars, and Bloomberg Philanthropies has $50 billion.”

    “Big Pharma is closely connected to Big Finance. Pfizer itself, along with the other major vax makers AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, is owned by the three major financial corporations BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. (The same Big Finance firms RFK Jr. singled out as owners of the Military Industrial complex, as Gateway Pundit reported.)”

     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,330
    77
    Camby area
    Telling others at the UN...yea this **** is not going to end well.



    And you thought you owned your home and as such had a right to its use. No, you peasant.

    Then they have this…



    They are already hinting at this in places like California. They mentioned in an NPR interview that to control flooding we need to remove many of the levees we built to keep the rivers in. We need to remove the levees so that the water can flow naturally into the lowlands to give the water somewhere to to so it doesnt keep getting higher and higher, eventually overtopping other levees, flooding towns downstream.

    The thought is if they remove the rural levees, when the water rises it has somewhere to go and then will eventually drain back down naturally, and it wont flood the cities and towns.

    There is one problem. After they built the levees, they "reclaimed" those lowlands and built neighborhoods because it would no longer flood. So those properties will need to be purchased and the residents relocated to other areas. I'm sure those residents wont go willingly.

    Think of it like reclaiming property to build a reservoir, except the water wont be there most of the time. It will only be there when it rains really REALLY hard. Like 50 year flood hard.
     

    smokingman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 11, 2008
    10,073
    149
    Indiana
    Top Bottom