That’s what it means. Not 51% though. Just > 50%.Honest question here.. Do you mean if a candidate achieves 51% counting can stop because a majority has been reached? I'm not familiar with past-the-post, just curious.
It would need to be >50% of votes cast, which I'm not sure how they would know what that number is until all ballots were counted. Or are they somehow able to calculate an accurate tally before they count all the absentee and mail ballots?That’s what it means. Not 51% though. Just > 50%.
Guys we knew they were going to do this again and again.Yep, that's the problem. The Left used the scamdemic to push mail in ballots so they can control elections going forward and we have no recourse to fix the problem. Ironic how they keep talking about "threats to democracy" when they've already killed it.
Right, you would still have to count all the ballots to know how many people voted total. But you wouldn't have to see who they were for just to count the total number. Then you could start over and count who they were for and when somebody gets >50% you could stop. I'm not sure that would save much of anything. Also it would make it so you don't know the winning margin which is extremely important for bragging rights.It would need to be >50% of votes cast, which I'm not sure how they would know what that number is until all ballots were counted. Or are they somehow able to calculate an accurate tally before they count all the absentee and mail ballots?
Why not early voting closes one week before the election and those votes are collated but not totaled. When the polls open on Election Day, the early votes are totaled but not revealed and then after the polls close all votes are tallied and totals revealed as tallying happens. No early votes not in by the opening of the polls are allowed. If your vote doesn't get made or counted you chose unwisely, thanks for playingSince we have a first-past-the-post system, they should stop counting when a candidate is past the post. Then if a candidate thinks he/she could be close, request a count of all the ballots. Or something like that.
Amen!Get rid of the computer voting machines and tabulators. All of them can be hacked and some are set up to weight votes for whichever side is desired .
Go back to paper ballots and hand counting.
Not shenanigan proof but takes a lot more work than a weighted vote/algorithm in the machine.
I don’t mind electronic voting machines if the code is all open source and the schematics are open to the public.Get rid of the computer voting machines and tabulators. All of them can be hacked and some are set up to weight votes for whichever side is desired .
Go back to paper ballots and hand counting.
Not shenanigan proof but takes a lot more work than a weighted vote/algorithm in the machine.
The machine will be running on all cylinders, for sure.Prediction 2024.
joe bidet runs again and gets even more votes than 2020 with his approval rating in the 30’s.
Mark your calendars.
FIFY. One dem got 1000 votes from a town of 750 in this election. No R raising cain about it though. Where is McConnel and McCarthy on this and all the other irregularities. They want these results.The fact that mail in voting is even up for debate, rather than flatly illegal and unthinkable, is why we can't fix the problem with votes.
Next presidentialIn this election, I wouldn't be surprised if more votes are counted than there are US citizens, and we'll be told that questioning that is domestic terrorism.
No thanks. You want to guess how much it would cost and how long it would take?Get rid of the computer voting machines and tabulators. All of them can be hacked and some are set up to weight votes for whichever side is desired .
Go back to paper ballots and hand counting.
Not shenanigan proof but takes a lot more work than a weighted vote/algorithm in the machine.
He’s got a point. Complaining isn’t going to fix this mess. Daddy’s not going fix it. Republicans need to learn how to exploit the system.
No thanks. You want to guess how much it would cost and how long it would take?
Why should tax payers have to for the bill for all this stolen election hogwash?
No thanks. You want to guess how much it would cost and how long it would take?
Why should tax payers have to for the bill for all this stolen election hogwash?
Ah....a loyalist.No thanks. You want to guess how much it would cost and how long it would take?
Why should tax payers have to for the bill for all this stolen election hogwash?