As I understand it, if you voted a majority for party X in the previous year election, you should be choosing to vote in party X's primary, not party Y's.
That should only be suggested for men, never tell a woman she can't change her mind.
As I understand it, if you voted a majority for party X in the previous year election, you should be choosing to vote in party X's primary, not party Y's.
This would be a real ****show if she did. Might even be entertaining.You are forgetting who is tanned, rested and waiting in the wings to be drafted...
Is she still toddling around?
You are forgetting who is tanned, rested and waiting in the wings to be drafted...
I was about to ask if you meant Trump... until you got to the drafted part.
You forgot to mention bone spurs. You are slipping.
You forgot to mention bone spurs. You are slipping.
As I understand it, if you voted a majority for party X in the previous year election, you should be choosing to vote in party X's primary, not party Y's.
"Should" is not "Must". People change party affiliation all the time. Look at all the talk of moderate democrats crossing over and voting for Trump if Bernie were to get the dem nomination.
Right, this is where intent kinda matters. If you are crossing over because the person you are voting for you legitimately want to hold the office they are seeking, no problem. If you are doing it with the intent of subverting the opposing party to help another, opposing party, candidate, well that person in my opinion doesn't really hold American values, and are certainly one of the reasons our nation has devolved into the "me first, everyone gets a trophy, Operation Varisty Blues" era.
AFAIK, cross-over primary voting, aka "raiding", is specifically called out and not within those rules in Indiana.
I get that, but this is the post I originally was replying to from Jetta. He seemed to indicate that it was specifically against the rules:
I'm not saying it's not "dirty trick" politics, but it's not "against the rules".
Right, this is where intent kinda matters. If you are crossing over because the person you are voting for you legitimately want to hold the office they are seeking, no problem. If you are doing it with the intent of subverting the opposing party to help another, opposing party, candidate, well that person in my opinion doesn't really hold American values, and are certainly one of the reasons our nation has devolved into the "me first, everyone gets a trophy, Operation Varisty Blues" era.
Intent counts now? What happened to something doesn't count unless it is "proven" in a court of law. Convenience rules.
How would you feel if there was a massive, nationwide effort to primary someone against Trump? Some milquetoast nobody that the Democrats crossed over to make the nominee instead of Trump?
Still not a big deal?
Intent counts now? What happened to something doesn't count unless it is "proven" in a court of law. Convenience rules.
How would you feel if there was a massive, nationwide effort to primary someone against Trump? Some milquetoast nobody that the Democrats crossed over to make the nominee instead of Trump?
Still not a big deal?
How would you feel if there was a massive, nationwide effort to primary someone against Trump? Some milquetoast nobody that the Democrats crossed over to make the nominee instead of Trump?
Still not a big deal?
That is exactly how we got Trump, massive Democrat turnover.