The [Current Year] General Political/Salma Hayek discussion thread, part 4!!!

[Fargo]

No always browsed and read through all the threads. Looked up a lot here when I started carrying few years ago.

And why would you jump to that conclusion after my comment? Did it insinuate I have? That’s 2 comments now you assumed something that was never implied.

When a new member decides to immediately jump in to opining on who should or should not be allowed to participate, it makes one wonder just exactly how new of a member they are.

That is particularly so, when their gripe revolves around a member accused of baiting other members into becoming former members.

Like I said, just wondering.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

I don’t wanna keep arguing. This has nothing to do with politics. If you wanna talk you can pm me tho, or we can talk politics. I made a couple comments in response to comments, replied to yours a couple, not going anywhere. Should’ve set the hook when I took the bait.

Nice to to meet you!

 

[Hatin Since 87]

When a new member decides to immediately jump in to opining on who should or should not be allowed to participate, it makes one wonder just exactly how new of a member they are.

That is particularly so, when their gripe revolves around a member accused of baiting other members into becoming former members.

Like I said, just wondering.

Ok I’ll bite. I never suggested him not being allowed to participate. I usually enjoy kut, and respect how he was as a LEO. He was genuinely a good guy. I’ve gave him rep a couple times. Again, you jump to conclusions awfully quick. I think he trolls about the trump issue. I’ve witnessed a few threads where more than just me see it.

And i don’t know why the emphasis on my join date. If you judge me that much over when I decided to create an account maybe I should judge you for not being a site supporter after being a member for 9 years. Seems kinda ridiculous right?

 

[Fargo]

Ok I’ll bite. I never suggested him not being allowed to participate. I usually enjoy kut, and respect how he was as a LEO. He was genuinely a good guy. I’ve gave him rep a couple times. Again, you jump to conclusions awfully quick. I think he trolls about the trump issue. I’ve witnessed a few threads where more than just me see it.

And i don’t know why the emphasis on my join date. If you judge me that much over when I decided to create an account maybe I should judge you for not being a site supporter after being a member for 9 years. Seems kinda ridiculous right?

I explained why the 3 month membership intrigued me.

I clicked on the politics thread to find it dominated by criticism of one members style. I opined on the topic y’all were on. The “you are like him” responses were fascinating.

 

[Hatin Since 87]

It wasn’t a criticism of his style until he began calling people hypocrites. There were a few responses from then, until you joined in. Now it’s becoming “dominated”. And the you like him “response”... singular not plural. I said it once, which you were by jumping to conclusions that weren’t there.

Have a good night

 

[Fargo]

Have a good night.

 

[Kutnupe14]

If he were actually here for intellectual conversation, open a dialogue and teach/learn he wouldn’t be “looking forward to pointing out hypocrisy”. He would be looking forward to opening conversations with an open mind to possibly look at things differently. Instead, it seems he would rather come swing a stick at a hornets nest then play the victim when he gets stung. Meanwhile, every time he gets stung he goes to the mods and another member is punished/banned and the numbers decline, all so he can bounce between forums straddling both sides of the fence on issues just to be an aggressor and ruffle feathers for something to do. But, to each their own. When he actually answers questions and asks questions it’s fine, but recently it’s cherry picking and trying to get people fired up instead of engaging in a constructive debate.

O'rly? I wonder if the mods are bothered by my constant reporting of people everytime I get "stung."

 

[Hatin Since 87]

Even the beekeepers know when someone crosses a point where they deserved being stung.

Not playing your cherry pickin games tonight little buddy.

 

[churchmouse]

And we will be closing this one down at the risk of folks getting a time out.
Seems we have lost our way tonight.

 

[churchmouse]

OK folks, lets try again. I will not be tested anymore on these in threads. Either keep it civil or just do not post. Any deviations will result in a perma-ban regardless of who it is.
This does go for all involved.

Last time I will post up and ask.

-CM-

 

[Hawkeye]

And you know they're triggered when they're comments stop being about the posts, but the poster.

Or it could be that they are tired of their posts being twisted. and their comments are really about the quality of the post as opposed to their opinion of the poster. (Kut's assignment: check the grammar in this and the quoted post.)

 

[Kutnupe14]

Or it could be that they are tired of their posts being twisted. and their comments are really about the quality of the post as opposed to their opinion of the poster. (Kut's assignment: check the grammar in this and the quoted post.)

Did you miss the post immediately before yours?

 

[Hawkeye]

Did you miss the post immediately before yours?

Nope. I posted from 2-3 pages back.

 

[Hawkeye]

Where's the Salma pics?

 

[churchmouse]

Or it could be that they are tired of their posts being twisted. and their comments are really about the quality of the post as opposed to their opinion of the poster. (Kut's assignment: check the grammar in this and the quoted post.)

Are you really silly enough to post this right after post #1230...........seriously.

You win the 1st time out award of the day. I am not playing anymore. I have tried to be casual but Noooooooo.

 

[ghitch75]

Are you really silly enough to post this right after post #1230...........seriously.

You win the 1st time out award of the day. I am not playing anymore. I have tried to be casual but Noooooooo.

bully.....

 

[churchmouse]

bully.....

 

[BugI02]

View attachment 67718

 

[nonobaddog]

She certainly does well against gravity.

 

[BugI02]

She certainly does well against gravity.

Being married to a billionaire certainly cuts down on the wear and tear, although in no respect do I get any kind of 'trophy wife' vibe off her. I think she's still herself