No.Coats is out.
Is it time to have that talk about why people seem to not last in this administration?
No.Coats is out.
Is it time to have that talk about why people seem to not last in this administration?
The start of Bailout 2.0?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ZwFC5qbe9BlEiEsFbRyas9RAQQt4GBbFSQkNHkUpQIg-Y
The start of Bailout 2.0?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ZwFC5qbe9BlEiEsFbRyas9RAQQt4GBbFSQkNHkUpQIg-Y
[h=1]Local soybean farmers don’t blame tariffs for low prices[/h]
https://www.fauquier.com/news/local...cle_9841c6a4-45a3-11e9-a7c8-4f0ec37b5500.html
Local soybean farmers don’t blame tariffs for low prices
https://www.fauquier.com/news/local...cle_9841c6a4-45a3-11e9-a7c8-4f0ec37b5500.html
In Coats case, it was due to his public disagreements and contradictions of Trump. He already has Coats' replacement lined up.
Dan Coats Out As Top Intelligence Chief After Series Of Public Clashes With Trump
Tariffs and bailouts, the free market at work.
In the article the farmer states “Prices were lower last year and last year was lower than the year before. The prices were low with Obama.” yet the Obama years were by far the best for soybean prices. Is anyone really going to argue the largest soybean importer putting a 25% tariff on our soybean exports isn't hurting the price?
These particular markets haven't been free in a long time with US industry, especially those in steel and manufacturing, getting the short end of the stick for decades.
The prices were low well before tariffs were in place. Soybean prices are volatile and in part based on speculation so of course the price is depressed in the short term. With growing conditions this year, I expect consumers who are not farmers will be complaining for the opposite reason this fall at harvest time.
good morning
Chew on this one, INGO
You’re probably making incorrect assumptions about your opposing political party
Only 22 percent of U.S. adults are on Twitter, and 80 percent of the tweets come from 10 percent of users. If you rely on Twitter for political information, you are being informed by ersatz pundits residing within 2.2 percent of the population.
Makes you wonder if getting this stressed/anxious/angry/etc about political nonsense is worth it. The super-minority is the loudest noise you're hearing. Most people just don't care.
Chew on this one, INGO
You’re probably making incorrect assumptions about your opposing political party
Only 22 percent of U.S. adults are on Twitter, and 80 percent of the tweets come from 10 percent of users. If you rely on Twitter for political information, you are being informed by ersatz pundits residing within 2.2 percent of the population.
Makes you wonder if getting this stressed/anxious/angry/etc about political nonsense is worth it. The super-minority is the loudest noise you're hearing. Most people just don't care.
Dude, I can clearly recall you extolling Twitter's virtue as some kind of real time news feed not that long ago (certainly within the last two years)
Now an early adopter is going to lecture us on how it isn't all of that? The stalls are empty, the position of the barn door is no longer matters. Personally, not on Twitter or Facetube. Relying on either for factual information is like shouting questions in a bar
None of that is mutually exclusive with a 25% tarif by the biggest importer hurting prices, I'm not sure why we aren't willing to cede that point here.
.Yes and there are a LOT of people that vote like they are actively trying to destroy America.
China will refuse to give up the “special and differential treatment” it enjoys as a developing nation at the World Trade Organisation, in a rebuke to a US proposal that would pare back the privileges China and other nations enjoy on trade.
China is categorised as a developing country at the Geneva-based institution, which affords it “special and differential treatment”. This enables China to provide subsidies in agriculture and set higher barriers to market entry than more developed economies.
The dispute reflects a fundamental divide within the WTO that has threatened the future of the global multilateral trading system.
The United States has long complained that too many WTO members – about two-thirds – define themselves as developing countries to take advantage of the terms the status permits them to trade under.
US President Donald Trump has railed against the organisation, calling it “a catastrophe” and “a disaster”.
However, countries such as China and India insist that the preferential treatment is an important cornerstone of the global trading system. Despite being the world’s second-largest economy and its biggest exporter, Beijing continues to label itself as “the world’s largest developing country”.
[snip]
Notable people need to stop interacting with nobodies.
Elitist post is elitist