The [Current Year] General Political/Salma Hayek discussion thread, part 4!!!

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Phase2

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 9, 2011
    7,014
    27
    Rep. Doug Collins: "At any time with the investigation, was your investigation curtailed, stopped, or hindered?"
    Robert Mueller: "No."

    No obstruction.

    -----------------

    [link]

    Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH): “When you talk about the firm that produced the Steele [dossier], the name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS. Is that correct?”

    Robert Mueller: “I’m not familiar ... with that”

    Chabot: “It’s not a trick question. It was Fusion GPS”
     
    Last edited:

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,570
    149
    Columbus, OH
    There is absolutely one source for this story... an FBI agent that allegedly investigated Clinton Foundation "suicided"

    Not linking the story, because it seems like bull**** made up from a single right-wing site.

    1563922692488.png

    Just checked, his obit is out there but no reputable news org from either side of the divide has picked up the story
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,780
    113
    Uranus
    No, I don't see it that way at all. This hearing isn't for neither the Anti-Trumpers, nor the Pro-Trumpers. This is for the fence sitters. They are waging a battle for the undecideds. Depending on who ultimately is the more believable (D's or R's), it should be a good thing for whichever side. And partisans aren't the ones who would know who wins and who loses, so this entire forum wouldn't have a clue. lol

    We'll wait until you had a chance to get [STRIKE]the programming[/STRIKE] the scoop elsewhere and report back here on how we should perceive this current theatrical episode.
    I for one can't wait!
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    Exhibit A: THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING EVER LISTEN TO ME RIGHT NOW SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE WE GOT HIM

    EAQfJ0_XkAAaPj6


    Exhibit B: It's actually nothing I knew he would do this because i have big brain

    EAQfJ0-XkAA0wK5
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    If it had anything to do with documents and their veracity or his own bravery and heroism, I'd rate Rather far below Trump

    Waiting for the story any day now about how two Proud Boys attacked him in an elevator; demanding to know the password

    President bone spurs? Really. Bravery? Since when is putting yourself at risk of getting a dose of VD a patriotic move?
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Rep. Doug Collins: "At any time with the investigation, was your investigation curtailed, stopped, or hindered?"
    Robert Mueller: "No."

    No obstruction.

    -----------------

    [link]

    Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH): “When you talk about the firm that produced the Steele [dossier], the name of the firm that produced that was Fusion GPS. Is that correct?”

    Robert Mueller: “I’m not familiar ... with that”

    Chabot: “It’s not a trick question. It was Fusion GPS”

    There might not be obstruction, but the attempt to do so is still a crime. At least from my understanding. I'll allow the legal eagles to correct me if I'm wrong.
     

    Phase2

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 9, 2011
    7,014
    27
    Charged with "wanting to obstruct a partisan hit-job investigation of a conspiracy theory supported by fraudulent evidence"? Yeah, try to impeach a president based that basis. Good luck with that crock.

    Jim Jordan
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,204
    149
    Valparaiso
    There might not be obstruction, but the attempt to do so is still a crime. At least from my understanding. I'll allow the legal eagles to correct me if I'm wrong.

    Well, someone can attempt to obstruct justice...and I think it's a crime...

    ...but you would have to prove that there was an underlying crime that you are trying to keep from being investigated (according to the Justice Dept.).

    In other words, if I try to thwart an investigation into my attempts to get Julie Newmar's e-mail address, I'm only obstructing justice if it's a crime to get Julie Newmar's e-mail address.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,780
    113
    Uranus

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    Japan military spending.

    1996: $40.5 billion
    2016: $41.5 billion

    India military spending.

    1996: $19.7 billion
    2016: $55.6 billion

    China military spending.

    1996: $27.8 billion
    2016: $225 billion
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    26,202
    149
    Japan military spending.

    1996: $40.5 billion
    2016: $41.5 billion

    India military spending.

    1996: $19.7 billion
    2016: $55.6 billion

    China military spending.

    1996: $27.8 billion
    2016: $225 billion
    China seems to by investing quite nicely in their quest for world dominance.

    Raising the red flag.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Coats is out.

    I am pleased to announce that highly respected Congressman John Ratcliffe of Texas will be nominated by me to be the Director of National Intelligence. A former U.S. Attorney, John will lead and inspire greatness for the Country he loves. Dan Coats, the current Director, will be leaving office on August 15th. I would like to thank Dan for his great service to our Country. The Acting Director will be named shortly.

    -DJT

    Is it time to have that talk about why people seem to not last in this administration?
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom