You should let the scholars know you defined religion for them…atheism is not a religion. Religions are all based on faith, which is the opposite of atheism.
You should let the scholars know you defined religion for them…atheism is not a religion. Religions are all based on faith, which is the opposite of atheism.
Is there an atmosphere in space?Interesting that when wanting to see how the world defined religion this Wikipedia definition with a disclaimer popped up.
“The definition of religion is a controversial and complicated subject in religious studies with scholars failing to agree on any one definition.”
So is it so far out there for someone to define a vacuum from religion as a religion itself?
You’re not this obtuse. Do better.You should let the scholars know you defined religion for them…
I posted up thread what the government is teaching in schools, it is a form of religion as it meets the federal definition of such…Is there an atmosphere in space?
The argument, "atheism is a religion" was created with one purpose only - to get Christianity into schools. It carries no water.
Furthermore, atheism is not taught in schools. Simply excluding all religious indoctrination is not equivalent.
You going to stick to that line when the Supreme Court declares teachers can be armed?Bottom line is; state and federal government have NO business in schools. That should be strictly a local function…
Do not need a SCOTUS decision to arm teachers, the local folks can decide that. The prohibition on arms in schools is from the entities I said should not be involved in children's education…You going to stick to that line when the Supreme Court declares teachers can be armed?
I have no love for the federal department of education, but I'm am in favour of the Constitution being equally applied; even in schools.
A) I miss where you posted that, would you be so kind as to provide a link?I posted up thread what the government is teaching in schools, it is a form of religion as it meets the federal definition of such…
Was Brown v. Board of Education bad law?Do not need a SCOTUS decision to arm teachers, the local folks can decide that. The prohibition on arms in schools is from the entities I said should not be involved in children's education…
So then no federal money and no state money. Right?Bottom line is; state and federal government have NO business in schools. That should be strictly a local function…
It was in this thread but I do not have time to find it…A) I miss where you posted that, would you be so kind as to provide a link?
B) "federal definition" of religion?
Was Brown v. Board of Education bad law?
You're really going to say that schools can openly flaunt the constitution, so long as that decision to do so is from the superintendent and the locally elected school board?
So you're not in favor of any laws the general assembly makes concerning crt, transgender sports, drag queen story hour? Because all those things should be decided at the local level, right?
Yes. There is no such thing as “federal money“ or “state money”, it is just the peoples money and it should be given to successful private schools…So then no federal money and no state money. Right?
First. Can you point me to that federal definition? I must have missed it.I posted up thread what the government is teaching in schools, it is a form of religion as it meets the federal definition of such…
Yes. There is federal and state level money. Federal taxes are paid to the Federal government. State taxes are paid to the State government. Local taxes are paid to local communities.Yes. There is no such thing as “federal money“ or “state money”, it is just the peoples money and it should be given to successful private schools…
No there is not. ALL MONEY belongs to the people.Yes. There is federal and state level money.
We gotta do something why we wait for the next shooter to show up here...
Ever find astrology in schools? What about celebrating the earth? halloween? Who determines what definition we use for religion?The 1st amendment protects religious exercise too. You are bending the definition to one that supports the constitutional protection you want rather than the one provided. The “establishment” prohibited by the constitution means the stake cannot make a defacto religion. The government privileging one over others IS effectively establishing a favored religion. So while I agree that prohibiting any religion from anything that smells like the state probably violates the free exercise clause, allowing 10 commandments and not religious materials from other religions violated the establishment clause.
Are you okay with Islam’s texts being displayed along side the 10 commandments? Or Wicca’s? If not, I think we’re finished here.
No one has claimed the exclusion of religious education determines what atheism is. Everyone has faith; either inFurthermore, atheism is not taught in schools. Simply excluding all religious indoctrination is not equivalent.
It takes no faith to not believe in an invisible being in the sky. Period.Atheism is a religion. One has faith in their own ability to determine if there is a god or not.