That was my thinking on some of this stuff. Exposing our capabilities.
Police, fire, highway construction and repair, probably the FAA...I don't spend much time following where my taxes go because I largely agree with you, but some of it pays for things I approve of.Do you guys think they were going to use that tax payer money to give you something? Shut up about it....
Waste tax payer money is the absolute most hilarious phrase.... That's all it ever is is wasted... Stop trying to control what you can't. Whiners. I sware.
Ok, there was a billionaire on that thing. No reason his family can’t foot the entire recovery bill. No reason to bring tax dollars into the discussion.Do you guys think they were going to use that tax payer money to give you something? Shut up about it....
Waste tax payer money is the absolute most hilarious phrase.... That's all it ever is is wasted... Stop trying to control what you can't. Whiners. I sware.
It hasn’t been a secret for quite some time. They used the same or preceding system to find K129That was my thinking on some of this stuff. Exposing our capabilities.
Sounds kind of like the Bidens then.Catastrophic failure at some point is baked in.
Did their "aerospace industry partners" not have something to say about that?The video I watched with james cameron talking about the hull was pretty informative.
Basically you can cycle extreme pressures to a steel hull hundreds of times without it weakening.
With the carbon fiber you have material layers that move at different rates when compressed and they rub against each other with every compression cycle.
Catastrophic failure at some point is baked in.
My sub was designed for 1,000 dive/surfaces.The video I watched with james cameron talking about the hull was pretty informative.
Basically you can cycle extreme pressures to a steel hull hundreds of times without it weakening.
With the carbon fiber you have material layers that move at different rates when compressed and they rub against each other with every compression cycle.
Catastrophic failure at some point is baked in.
It hasn’t been a secret for quite some time. They used the same or preceding system to find K129
Project Azorian - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Did their "aerospace industry partners" not have something to say about that?
Or maybe aerospace just doesn't deal with pressure environments like that.
Their "partners" denied having any involvement with the design of the Titan submersible's pressure vessel contrary to what Oceangate has said.Did their "aerospace industry partners" not have something to say about that?
Or maybe aerospace just doesn't deal with pressure environments like that.
Tom Clancy wrote about it in "The Hunt for Red October" published in 1984.It hasn’t been a secret for quite some time. They used the same or preceding system to find K129
Project Azorian - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Their "partners" denied having any involvement with the design of the Titan submersible's pressure vessel contrary to what Oceangate has said.
The CEO of Oceangate Expedition Stockton Rush said in a 2020 interview that OceanGate had worked with all three institutions to develop the pressure vessel for the Titan.
Mr Rush said: "There are certain things that you want to be buttoned down."
"The pressure vessel is not MacGyver at all, because that's where we worked with Boeing and NASA and the University of Washington.
NASA said: "NASA Marshall engineers only participated remotely in technical interchange meetings with OceanGate, providing consultation for materials and manufacturing processes based on industry standards.
"We did not provide any approvals for the project as OceanGate was the technical authority."
Boeing said it was "not a partner on the Titan and did not design or build it". The University of Washington also denied involvement in making the ship.
Was this said before or after it went missing?Their "partners" denied having any involvement with the design of the Titan submersible's pressure vessel contrary to what Oceangate has said.
The CEO of Oceangate Expedition Stockton Rush said in a 2020 interview that OceanGate had worked with all three institutions to develop the pressure vessel for the Titan.
Mr Rush said: "There are certain things that you want to be buttoned down."
"The pressure vessel is not MacGyver at all, because that's where we worked with Boeing and NASA and the University of Washington.
NASA said: "NASA Marshall engineers only participated remotely in technical interchange meetings with OceanGate, providing consultation for materials and manufacturing processes based on industry standards.
"We did not provide any approvals for the project as OceanGate was the technical authority."
Boeing said it was "not a partner on the Titan and did not design or build it". The University of Washington also denied involvement in making the ship.
That's weird. I was thinking it was around 85 or 86.Tom Clancy wrote about it in "The Hunt for Red October" published in 1984.
What's top secret about it, is where it is and what the capabilities are.
Oddly, it came out on October 1, 1984. At least that's what the interweb tells me.That's weird. I was thinking it was around 85 or 86.
I had a book from the first 3 printings. I know that because it was printed by the US Naval Institute, and they printed 3 printings, before selling it to another publisher.