I honestly haven't been following this. Many in the radical left media seem to think this is a "gotcha" moment. What's the "gotcha"?
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Political funny picture thread, part 3
- Thread starter KJQ6945
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
I honestly haven't been following this. Many in the radical left media seem to think this is a "gotcha" moment. What's the "gotcha"?
IIRC, He gave Hannity some tips on his real estate holdings a while back so he's guilty as sin! Of something...not sure what.
They have the torches and pitchforks out but I still don't know why. What's the hubbub, bub?
As far as I know, that's all there is to it. He said Hannity's name. The MSM doesn't need any more than this. They run with nothing all the time.
It gives people with TDS who are emotionally invested in hate for Trump a false reason to get out of bed in the morning.
WE HAVE HIM THIS TIME FOR SURE!
I'm all for responsible printing press regulations, those things go off all on their own worse than guns. You just can't trust them.
Timjoebillybob
Grandmaster
- Feb 27, 2009
- 9,567
- 149
This should perhaps go in the sad but true thread.
A judge asked Michael Cohen to name his clients, after he claimed he had there. Two were named, but there was pushback on naming the third. Cohen then named Hannity. Hannity says he's not a client of Cohen, despite Cohen naming him, and also Hannity is trying to claim attorney/client privilege.
People who are willing to believe that Cohen simply gave Hannity of "advice," haven't quite been able to explain why (if that's true) Cohen would list him as a "client." Lawyers give advice all the time, yet this is the first time that type of advice given to Hannity by Cohn, which Hannity has implied as minor, enables him to be outed (by Cohen as a client). When Houghmade and Fargo give relatively minor advice, here on INGO, are they expected to list us as clients? Besides the fact that Hannity has been staunchly defending Cohen, in light of their relationship, the above is problematic. "Anti-Trumper" legal minds Alan Dershowitz and Judge Napolitano both agree that Hannity should have disclosed this relationship.
Almost any picture in this thread meets that requirement.
Did someone mistake Hannity for an objective journalist or something? He's a biased commentator and always has been. He's also either not that bright or will say whatever it takes to trigger people...probably both....which doesn't mean he's always wrong, but makes his rightness somewhat less than a given.
I don't see this as much because I never had any particular faith in Hannity to begin with.
Last edited:
Engineer - The glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
- Status
