At 8pm tonight Project Veritas will be releasing a video on the covid vax, and it sounds pretty spicey already.
Federal whistleblowers.
I also found this that is coincidently being broadcast at 8pm and I don’t believe in coincidence!At 8pm tonight Project Veritas will be releasing a video on the covid vax, and it sounds pretty spicey already.
Federal whistleblowers.
He brought up known-toxic combinations, and I'm the one who is "deflecting"?I think you understood his post, not sure why you refused to address the point he made but it seems the pro vaccine crowd would rather deflect than address.
Sure. I just hope whatever decision one makes is as informed as possible. Here's the thing, though: we've got a lot of data regarding the safety of mRNA vaccines in general, and a decent-and-growing set of data regarding the Covid vaccine in particular. We've also got quite a bit of data regarding potential long-term effects from Covid. My point with the prior question is that concern regarding the long-term effects of the vaccine, alone, probably isn't sufficient reason to avoid the vaccine. (But if you want to base a decision on that, it's certainly your right to do so.)In other words you don't know.
You still get infected with covid if you're vaccinated, with no knowledge if you're protected from long term consequences from it.
So you can take your chances with getting potential issues 2-5 years down the road from covid, or roll the dice twice with the vaccine AND covid.
Do you really think you missed something that hasn't been said repeatedly?I've been away from my two-factor-authenticated device for a week, and there are some 30 new pages. Did I miss anything?
Heh; likely not - which is why I just skipped to the end!Do you really think you missed something that hasn't been said repeatedly?
What do you mean that we have alot of data on the mRNA vaccine?Sure. I just hope whatever decision one makes is as informed as possible. Here's the thing, though: we've got a lot of data regarding the safety of mRNA vaccines in general, and a decent-and-growing set of data regarding the Covid vaccine in particular. We've also got quite a bit of data regarding potential long-term effects from Covid. My point with the prior question is that concern regarding the long-term effects of the vaccine, alone, probably isn't sufficient reason to avoid the vaccine. (But if you want to base a decision on that, it's certainly your right to do so.)
Not a new phrase at all.I’d sure like to know then etymology of that word. But I think it started in liberal circles and then moved towards those who are anti vax using it as a slur.
regardless it’s a brand new phrase trying to dilute what is actually being done.
The entire point of his post was sometimes safe chemicals aren’t safe once combined with other safe chemicals. You’re right, those are known toxic combos. Keyword, known, at one point in time those combos being toxic were unknown. It’s deflecting because you knew and understood the point he was making, but chose not to address it.He brought up known-toxic combinations, and I'm the one who is "deflecting"?
As for being "pro-vaccine": I am pro-science, and pro-freedom. I am pro-making-your-own-informed-decision regarding the vaccine.
Where’s @nad63 when you need him?Not a new phrase at all.
I have heard my British friends use that term for years.
I often find myself using some British slang, especially when I talk with my Brit friends, such as:
Jab
Fortnight
Lift
Bloody
Quid
Nicked
Knackered
Chuffed
Bespoke
Lorry
Loo
Fancy
Pissed
Bollocks
Knickers
Torch
Let
Wanker
Boot
Bonnet
Petrol
Cinema
Flat
Holiday
Takeaway
Pram
Sweets
Mum
Candyfloss
Post
Motorway
Queue
Made redundant
Rubbish
Pork pies
I spell my words that end in "or", as "our", like labour or colour.
Well you missed a pretty good conversation concerning the cover up of deaths and injuries from the vaccine. I honestly have no idea where it is, maybe somebody remembers and can link it.I've been away from my two-factor-authenticated device for a week, and there are some 30 new pages. Did I miss anything?
Sure. I just hope whatever decision one makes is as informed as possible. Here's the thing, though: we've got a lot of data regarding the safety of mRNA vaccines in general, and a decent-and-growing set of data regarding the Covid vaccine in particular. We've also got quite a bit of data regarding potential long-term effects from Covid. My point with the prior question is that concern regarding the long-term effects of the vaccine, alone, probably isn't sufficient reason to avoid the vaccine. (But if you want to base a decision on that, it's certainly your right to do so.)
Quotes are backwards, best I can do on my phone.In other words you don't know.
You still get infected with covid if you're vaccinated, with no knowledge if you're protected from long term consequences from it.
So you can take your chances with getting potential issues 2-5 years down the road from covid, or roll the dice twice with the vaccine AND covid.
mRNA vaccines have been around for two decades.What do you mean that we have alot of data on the mRNA vaccine?
Its a new vaccine,how can there be alot of data on it?
And no one knows the long term affects.