Looks like information is getting out ahead of the censors, MSM is failing in their propaganda mission. FDA advisory committee voted against the 3rd shot booster. Who on earth is still taking the first round?
Looks like information is getting out ahead of the censors, MSM is failing in their propaganda mission. FDA advisory committee voted against the 3rd shot booster. Who on earth is still taking the first round?
I heard on the news this morning that they had a second vote and that one was in favor of the booster for those over 65.
Exactly what I've done. The virus is most deadly to those over 75/80 and/or with serious health issues. I'm not in that group so my odds of issues with the virus are very low. The side effects however, could affect anyone taking the shot. My feeling is that I have a higher chance of having side effects from the vax then I would having issues from COVID. So I have decided against the vax, as is my right no matter what "President" Bidiot thinks.Make your choice, but a smart man would look at all angles.
I dont know how much weight I would put on the watchdog article. Her own linked in says she is a pharmaceutical business analyst not the same thing as the watchdog article states and she has a bachelor's in business.One hour Video discusses adverse shot effects. I'm half way through it and it's a rough one. It was stated that the Cures Act signed Dec 13, 2016, included a provision in section 3024 that eliminated the informed consent about risks and alternatives under an Emergency Use Act use. I did read it this link:
21st Century Cures Act - Provisions Relating to Regulation of Clinical Research
On December 13, 2016, President Obama signed into law the 21st Century Cures Act (the Act), just days after it passed in the U.S. House of…www.lexology.com
CV19 Vaccines are Poison – Karen Kingston | Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog
By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Saturday Post) Karen Kingston is a top pharmaceutical analyst who has researched and written about many cutting edge drugs. She has been ostracized and attacked by Big Pharma because she is speaking out about the great harm being done by the so-called CV19...usawatchdog.com
What is the interruption @ the 4-hour, 12-minute and 30ish second mark?
I do think that since Biden said for months and set a date of 09/20 for booster shots to begin and then the FDA voted it down along with a couple of FDA people resigning in the last couple of weeks or so that they are not quite yet the rubber stamp you are making them out to be....yet.Does anyone really think evidence matters anymore? If Biden says six boosters and vaccination of fetuses before birth, the FDA will approve six boosters and vaccination of fetuses before birth. That much should be clear after the clown show of approving the original shot years before the trials will be complete.
Your correct!Does anyone really think evidence matters anymore? If Biden says six boosters and vaccination of fetuses before birth, the FDA will approve six boosters and vaccination of fetuses before birth. That much should be clear after the clown show of approving the original shot years before the trials will be complete.
IIRC that was just an advisory committee that isn't binding. And they came back five minutes later and voted for boosters for over-65s. I don't think their (extremely few, and short) trials even contained hardly any over-65s.I do think that since Biden said for months and set a date of 09/20 for booster shots to begin and then the FDA voted it down along with a couple of FDA people resigning in the last couple of weeks or so that they are not quite yet the rubber stamp you are making them out to be....yet.
I don’t think it’s so much just doing whatever Biden says as it is keeping up the charade. They’ve put too much faith into these vaccines as the way to save everyone. I mean, to the point of using force to make it happen. If the vaccine makers say the effectiveness wanes and you have to get boosters, there doesn’t seem to be much footing for the FDA, Biden, or anyone else to stand on. The “vaccines will save us all” crowd has put themselves in a hostage situation with the pharmaceutical companies. If people say the vaccines are the only savior, and the maker says “yes but only with boosters,” how can they argue at this point? That’s the problem with putting all your eggs in one basket.IIRC that was just an advisory committee that isn't binding. And they came back five minutes later and voted for boosters for over-65s. I don't think their (extremely few, and short) trials even contained hardly any over-65s.
It's a joke. Boosters will be approved for all in a week or two. Then we'll have the pleasure of watching the double-vaxxed sheep get told they are now all unvaccinated for purposes of the social credit app.
I really hope she is wrong, but there are some technical points that seemed valid to me. My understanding is she reads the information about the drugs, the massive amount of paperwork that comes with it, and conveys a condensed version to medical people.I dont know how much weight I would put on the watchdog article. Her own linked in says she is a pharmaceutical business analyst not the same thing as the watchdog article states and she has a bachelor's in business.
She may be right, but she is in sales and marketing not pharmaceutical research.
Bill, me personally I tend to believe Dr. Malone's information and he's done an increasing amount of interviews. He seems to have a conscience unlike most other news sources. Bannon's rumble channel has decent content. Also consider Rumble is a non censored platform, as far as I know.So I’m sure there is someone on here that can tell me if the posted video Is
B.S or accurate?
I have heard some others say this but like you believe that he is honestly just putting the facts out there, but just want to hear other peoples thoughts on this subject as well as wade through all of the disinformation that is floating all over the web! ThanksBill, me personally I tend to believe Dr. Malone's information and he's done an increasing amount of interviews. He seems to have a conscience unlike most other news sources. Bannon's rumble channel has decent content. Also consider Rumble is a non censored platform, as far as I know.
If you look at my post 1145 on this page, the lady in the video talks about what the FDA has said and it's in print, not just her opinion.