Here Comes the Executive Order on Background Checks

[GodFearinGunTotin]

I've already been declared the enemy. "Social interaction" isn't going to change that.

Just as an observation: This seems to be what you want. People respond to what is posted. If this is not how you wish to be thought of, you might reconsider your posting approach.

 

[richardraw316]

I need a therapy session. I would like to meet more like minded people aswell.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

For the record, I never got a burger.

Me neither. I think it's a lie, myself.

 

[jbombelli]

I can say with certainty that the cheeseburger exists in the real world.

 

[KG1]

and yet he offered to meet with you, which kinda breaks the anonymity.

I've met quite a few NWI and Indy INGOers. I may not agree with them all on everything. But they're not anonymous people on the other end of a screen.

Personally I would not meet with anybody in NWI and I live in NWI. (I keed..I keed) I just don't have time for no "Social interactions"

 

[cobber]

I am not driving to west Timbuktu.......

It's not as far as it sounds!

 

[Lowe0]

I really don't see what a polite "no, thank you" has to do with our choice of candidates come November?

 

[BugI02]

You apparently don't see what one side being antithetical to our second ammendment rights has to do with our choice of candidates in November, either. Perhaps one of us needs a vision check

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Personally I would not meet with anybody in NWI and I live in NWI. (I keed..I keed) I just don't have time for no "Social interactions"

(Hey....umm....posting on INGO IS a social interaction.).

 

[KG1]

(Hey....umm....posting on INGO IS a social interaction.).

It is? I need to stop then.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

It is? I need to stop then.

Only if you have time.

 

[IndyDave1776]

I really don't see what a polite "no, thank you" has to do with our choice of candidates come November?

Let's see...

1. You apparently don't care much for the people here.
2. You don't care enough about the Second Amendment to place it ahead of sodomy in your political priorities.
3. By extension, you must not care enough about your gun(s) to be concerned about keeping it/them.
4. 70% of your posts are in the General Political forum. I am generally one of the worst offenders in this regard and run only about 50%.

It gets pretty difficult to make the connection. You don't like us, you don't like the Second Amendment, and you don't seem to like guns a whole lot. It is difficult to understand what draws you. I am not suggesting that you shouldn't participate, I just don't understand why when it seems that there is nothing about the place that you like.

 

[bwframe]

Let's see...

1. You apparently don't care much for the people here.
2. You don't care enough about the Second Amendment to place it ahead of sodomy in your political priorities.
3. By extension, you must not care enough about your gun(s) to be concerned about keeping it/them.
4. 70% of your posts are in the General Political forum. I am generally one of the worst offenders in this regard and run only about 50%.

It gets pretty difficult to make the connection. You don't like us, you don't like the Second Amendment, and you don't seem to like guns a whole lot. It is difficult to understand what draws you. I am not suggesting that you shouldn't participate, I just don't understand why when it seems that there is nothing about the place that you like.

ID1776 hits a home run without taking the whole page to do it.

 

[SteveM4A1]

2. You don't care enough about the Second Amendment to place it ahead of sodomy in your political priorities.

Seriously? Attack his position with facts and logic, not condescending remarks.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Seriously? Attack his position with facts and logic, not condescending remarks.

No condescension about it. We dealt with those two issues in tandem at some length, just not in this thread. He made his position on his priorities between the two extremely clear.

 

[pudly]

Seriously? Attack his position with facts and logic, not condescending remarks.

It is an accurate summation of Lowe0's priority.

 

[churchmouse]

Seriously? Attack his position with facts and logic, not condescending remarks.

This has been ongoing through several threads.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Seriously? Attack his position with facts and logic, not condescending remarks.

No condescension about it. We dealt with those two issues in tandem at some length, just not in this thread. He made his position on his priorities between the two extremely clear.

It is an accurate summation of Lowe0's priority.

This has been ongoing through several threads.

Seems like I recall at least one thread ID is talking about.

 

[bwframe]

...You don't care enough about the Second Amendment to place it ahead of sodomy in your political priorities...

Seriously? Attack his position with facts and logic, not condescending remarks.

Not condescending at all. One can certainly have both of those in today's day and age, so long as they don't confuse which is most important in the voting booth.

It's about time someone called that pot stirring troublemaker out. Good job Dave!

 

[Caleb]

I was wonder how one can own guns but willing to to give up and give in....

Also....somebody said something about shoot and burgers, and maybe bacon....when and where?