You know, I hadn't considered this angle (and I haven't seen anyone else posit it either), but that would be pretty slick as a strategy. Unfortunately though, I doubt anything meaningful is done to Waters. Members of her party are nothing if not consistent and unwavering in their lockstep support of anything any of them say.Here is my take on the Jury. It's just an opinion, and I know, everyone has one.....
The judge told the defense when he asked for a mistrial on the basis of Maxine Waters statements that he would not grant a mistrial, but that he said, and I quote "could lead to this whole trial being overturned". In my mind, maybe Jury said OK, lets convict, as he is most likely going to get it overturned due to Water's statements. They stave off the riots and burning and just pass the buck along. Next trial please...
I've progressed past anger and into grieving... for our nation. And this statement has nothing to do with race, btw. Take that how you will.Ya’ll need to step away from the computer before you bust a blood vessel.
I appreciate the distinction.I've progressed past anger and into grieving... for our nation. And this statement has nothing to do with race, btw. Take that how you will.
You should probably have been out saying that to the burn loot murder bunch, or does that not bother you as much as people stewing on the internet?Ya’ll need to step away from the computer before you bust a blood vessel.
Thank you for asking the question that I was too embarrassed to ask. (I wondered that too!)How could the jury find Chauvin guilty of three different charges ? Admittedly I don’t know the finer points/distinction of each of the guilty verdict offenses, but it would seem the jury would find guilty for ONE OFFENSE not three.
Because they had a gun to their head.How could the jury find Chauvin guilty of three different charges ? Admittedly I don’t know the finer points/distinction of each of the guilty verdict offenses, but it would seem the jury would find guilty for ONE OFFENSE not three.
Though I think Waters should have to pay, I don't think she will. My opinion is that the Jury, not wanting in their conscience to have to deal with the repercussions of an acquittal, literally kicked the can down the road. As the judge had already stated they had a case for overturning the judgement, they decided not to be the scapegoats. Let it be someone else's problem.You know, I hadn't considered this angle (and I haven't seen anyone else posit it either), but that would be pretty slick as a strategy. Unfortunately though, I doubt anything meaningful is done to Waters. Members of her party are nothing if not consistent and unwavering in their lockstep support of anything any of them say.
I just saw this they are patheticI feel absolutely nauseous. That ho, harris was just on television, scolding all of us, and talking down to us, and now, drunk ol` uncle joe is on the tube, doing his best to read the teleprompter and act as though he is coherent. What a saint floyd was. A junkie, counterfeiter, career criminal.
Ya’ll need to step away from the computer before you bust a blood vessel.
Oh right, I understood. My reply was probably less than clear though. I would agree with both the overturn and some kind of penalty for Waters, up to and including removal from office.Though I think Waters should have to pay, I don't think she will. My opinion is that the Jury, not wanting in their conscience to have to deal with the repercussions of an acquittal, literally kicked the can down the road. As the judge had already stated they had a case for overturning the judgement, they decided not to be the scapegoats. Let it be someone else's problem.
Its never about the verdict. Its about thugs and free s***Here's that victory lap...
Calling for the rioters to stand down? Not seeing it yet...
I'm watching reruns of "Home Improvement". It makes me happy.I feel absolutely nauseous. That ho, harris was just on television, scolding all of us, and talking down to us, and now, drunk ol` uncle joe is on the tube, doing his best to read the teleprompter and act as though he is coherent. What a saint floyd was. A junkie, counterfeiter, career criminal.