Four Minneapolis officers fired after death of black man part II

[Tombs]

Twitter allows that?

Guess you forgot who was in control for a moment.

 

[gregr]

Apologies if this has been talked about and I`ve missed it, but has it been said what the make up of the jury was?

 

[DadSmith]

Guess you forgot who was in control for a moment.

But, but it isn't fair.

 

[Kutnupe14]

You should probably have been out saying that to the burn loot murder bunch, or does that not bother you as much as people stewing on the internet?

Why don’t YOU go out and tell them, or would you prefer stewing on the internet? Im doing fine over here, in the “burbs.”

I was just giving a friendly warning, because tempers were running high, and lines have already been crossed. So rather than somone getting a TO, it might do well to step away for a minute and catch their breath. And it has nothing to do with interacting with yours truly.

 

[DadSmith]

Apologies if this has been talked about and I`ve missed it, but has it been said what the make up of the jury was?

12 very scared and intimidated people.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Apologies if this has been talked about and I`ve missed it, but has it been said what the make up of the jury was?

Why does that make a difference?

 

[gregr]

12 very scared and intimidated people.

Fair enough. I just had visions of the OJ jury where the brotha` flashed the black power sign to him after the not guilty verdict.

 

[Kutnupe14]

12 very scared and intimidated people.

Would you be one of those intimidated people if you were on that jury? I’m wondering how many people here would vote to “appease the mob?”

 

[nonobaddog]

Twitter allows that?

It kinda seems like calling for murder should cross some kind of line maybe.

 

[buckwacker]

Why don’t YOU go out and tell them, or would you prefer stewing on the internet? Im doing fine over here, in the “burbs.”

I was just giving a friendly warning, because tempers were running high, and lines have already been crossed. So rather than somone getting a TO, it might do well to step away for a minute and catch their breath. And it has nothing to do with interacting with yours truly.

Just being friendly?
What lines were crossed?

 

[Kutnupe14]

Fair enough. I just had visions of the OJ jury where the brotha` flashed the black power sign to him after the not guilty verdict.

OJ’s Jury was 9B, 2W, 1H

 

[Tombs]

Would you be one of those intimidated people if you were on that jury? I’m wondering how many people here would vote to “appease the mob?”

I wouldn't give my life for Chauvin.

No reasonable person would. So why would I expect a jury to do so?

 

[Kutnupe14]

I wouldn't give my life for Chauvin.

No reasonable person would. So why would I expect a jury to do so?

So you’d lie? Not exactly a ringing endorsement of American patriotism, is it?

 

[JCSR]

I wouldn't give my life for Chauvin.

No reasonable person would. So why would I expect a jury to do so?

And that's why Chauvin could not get a fair trial. He was guilty when George Floyd was born black.

 

[KittySlayer]

It’s sad the good ones are going to leave, but I don’t blame anyone for not wanting to risk their lives and their futures for someone to play politics with. Sad day for America.

Sad all the way around. Police Academies will no longer be able to recruit the best candidates. They’ll lower standards to get warm bodies to drive squad cars. Poorly qualified and poorly trained cops will fill the ranks. Mistakes will happen. Incompetence will happen. Corruption will happen.

The left will get the unexpected consequences of their wishes. It will all swirl down like flushing a toilet in the Southern Hemisphere, just in the opposite direction. Welcome to the S.Holes of the future.

 

[DadSmith]

What happened to a jury of your peers? Shouldn't he have been judged by 12 people in law enforcement? If you go back to where this right stems from the Magna Carta it specifically says a jury on equal terms. As in a lord is is to have a jury of lords not peasants.
So a police officer should have a jury of law enforcement because they would be his only peers. Just a thought.

 

[nonobaddog]

Would you be one of those intimidated people if you were on that jury? I’m wondering how many people here would vote to “appease the mob?”

If there were credible threats to my family from the blm terrorist mob I would probably think very seriously about protecting them and sacrificing Chauvin. I say this because there seems to be no other protection from LE or the government and we would be pretty much on our own against the mob that is talking openly about getting blood on their hands and calling for murder.

 

[Tombs]

So you’d lie? Not exactly a ringing endorsement of American patriotism, is it?

I'd do what's necessary to keep myself and my family alive.

If anyone needs to take a break from the computer, you do.

 

[Tombs]

What happened to a jury of your peers? Shouldn't he have been judged by 12 people in law enforcement? If you go back to where this right stems from the Magna Carta it specifically says a jury on equal terms. As in a lord is is to have a jury of lords not peasants.
So a police officer should have a jury of law enforcement because they would be his only peers. Just a thought.

A jury of nothing but police would have been a bit skewed even for my tastes.

But yes I do think at least a few police should have been on the jury.

 

[ChristianPatriot]

Now I’ve seen it all.

A felon drug addict OD’d while in police custody and the arresting officer was convicted of freaking 2nd degree murder while the President of the United States applauds it as “justice”.

We are well and truly screwed folks. America had a nice run.