Source?Good morning.
People in the business expressed concern over it, along with other consequences.
By the way, have you looked at what Luc Montagnier has been saying?
I haven't seen any actual scientists express concern over it.
Source?Good morning.
People in the business expressed concern over it, along with other consequences.
By the way, have you looked at what Luc Montagnier has been saying?
Certainly can't find any and didn't see any at time. I find it hard to believe that any scientist would fear the mRNA vaccines would alter DNA since that's not how that works.Multiple sources back a year or so ago. Hopefully not scrubbed if you go looking for them.
That's not how it is intended to work. Bear in mind that you're talking about biological systems, not gear boxes.Certainly can't find any and didn't see any at time. I find it hard to believe that any scientist would fear the mRNA vaccines would alter DNA since that's not how that works.
"On the record" means something... even if taken down, Web Archive, screenshot, etc.Good morning.
People in the business expressed concern over it, along with other consequences.
By the way, have you looked at what Luc Montagnier has been saying?
You want me to go look things up for you?"On the record" means something... even if taken down, Web Archive, screenshot, etc.
Linky?
That's not how it is intended to work. Bear in mind that you're talking about biological systems, not gear boxes.
Sure, please do... AFAIK, such a link doesn't exist... I've looked before.You want me to go look things up for you?
You are mistaken.Wait... I thought your point was that the mRNA vaccines AS DESIGNED altered a person's DNA.
Not so?
Sure, please do... AFAIK, such a link doesn't exist... I've looked before.
Support your claim that "virologists" are "on the record" with concerns mRNA vaccines alter DNA.
The biological systems that exist aren't capable of incorporating an mRNA vaccine into the human genome.That's not how it is intended to work. Bear in mind that you're talking about biological systems, not gear boxes.
Debate is point, counter point... finding areas of agreement and disagreement... asking for a link or other support for an assertion of an expert, any expert, on the record is not cultist... it IS debate.Some of you here are like cultists, you are compelled to attack anything that questions the cult. You act like science has not been politicized and worse, co-opted by the military of our enemies if not our own too. Our medical and science health organizations have explicitly lied to us, but you still believe them.
News flash!!! If it cannot be openly debated, it is not science....
Or, now try to pay attention.Some of you here are like cultists, you are compelled to attack anything that questions the cult. You act like science has not been politicized and worse, co-opted by the military of our enemies if not our own too. Our medical and science health organizations have explicitly lied to us, but you still believe them.
News flash!!! If it cannot be openly debated, it is not science....
You can be cavalier about this, rest on the notion that its safe unless exhaustively proven otherwise, and get jabbed until you look like a pincushion.Source?
I haven't seen any actual scientists express concern over it.
I'm not cavalier about it. I just understand the science of mRNA vaccines and human genetics. It's not like mRNA vaccines just suddenly became a thought last year, many institutions have been researching the technology for many years. It was even discussed in some of my text books back in school.You can be cavalier about this, rest on the notion that its safe unless exhaustively proven otherwise, and get jabbed until you look like a pincushion.
As for me, I am not going to serve as a lab rat for people I particularly distrust pushing unproven "vaccines" for which they have been granted an exemption from liability.
Then why don't they have actual FDA approval, subject to the same liability standards as any other medication?As to your lab rat comment, the vaccines were tested and shown to be safe and effective.
Are you arguing that something can’t be a vaccine until it passes FDA hoops?Then why don't they have actual FDA approval, subject to the same liability standards as any other medication?
If you want to take that chance, you are absolutely welcome to do so. I am not.Are you arguing that something can’t be a vaccine until it passes FDA hoops?
I think the answer is ‘time’.