That is an amazing statement. Amazing in how the same article in an American media source can reference a German lab trial, while talking about a British and South African clinical trial of 2000 to cloud the fact neither US accepted vaccine works against the new variant."But scientists caution that it’s difficult to extrapolate what such lab experiments mean for the real world. The experiments only look at neutralizing antibodies, while the immune response includes other types of antibodies as well as fighters like T cells. With that thinking, it’s possible that the real immune response from vaccines is even more robust against mutations than the lab data show."
It did all that while offering cover to scientists about the fact they could be wrong while offering hope that what the actual science showed could be wrong. That the vaccines could in fact be more robust(work at all)against the new variants.
It is a word salad that does not change that in multiple studies we now have proof the vaccines do not work any better than saline against the South African variant.
Last edited: