Who wants a Biden vaccine passport?

[IndyDave1776]

And Delta's CEO is out against Georgia's new voting laws. Don't you need an ID to board a Delta plane?

I am guessing Delta's illustrious CEO stuck a moistened finger in the air and is getting on board with what he anticipates to be the new order.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

No ID needed to vote, but a VAX ID needed to walk in a building? I’m genuinely concerned for my grand kids future..

Only those with brain-worms who are elected to Congress from Georgia are proposing this.

VAX ID is for international travel. Those of us with family and friends overseas would like such a document for nations with onerous visa health requirements.

 

[jamil]

Read the policy platforms and compare.

MSM propaganda is not the same as simply reading a candidate's platform.

Then answer me this, did Trump reasonably stick to the majority of his platform? Therefor giving legitimacy to the fact he actually was aligned with what he said he was aligned with?

I'm talking about applying your logic consistently. You're essentially claiming that by voting for Biden they WANTED everything that encompasses Biden. As if they saw Biden as all pros and no cons. But you don't get that in candidates. There's always some con that makes the candidate imperfect. Except if you might be so biased that you're incapable of seeing any faults. If you saw zero faults with Trump, it likely means you overlooked those faults because of the pros. And we can work with that. Does voting for Trump mean you agree with men going out and ****ing porn stars while their wife is pregnant? The other side would say you do, because they're applying the same logic to you.

Voting for an imperfect candidate does not mean that you WANT those imperfections. It may mean that you overlooked them because of whatever pros there are, or because you think the imperfections in the other candidate are much worse. When I voted for Trump I was not voting FOR those characteristics, I didn't WANT them.

I'm disagreeing with the statement that they WANTED gun control. That's just an "othering" mechanism. It's more likely that they had serious TDS for Trump and foolishly believe/believed that Biden was harmless. If you go back and look at their own justifications, that's pretty much what was said. "Trump is too poopy to be muh prez, Biden won't be able to get gun control passed."

 

[DadSmith]

My mother is ovarian, Stage 3-4. No theater, no church, no trips to Southern Indiana. Very rough, BUT the worm is turning.

With more and more vaccinations each day, there is no reason for a state mandate and state restrictions. Happy Holcomb has ceded this back to the county where it belongs.

I sure hope you don't get some kind of awful disease as a side effect from the vaccine come a few years down the road. Ask GI about the crap they pumped into them in Desert Storm. Many still have major problems and many had children that had problems. Sure the DoJ or the VA won't say it was from them experimental vaccines they gave. Where else could it have came from? It effected to many of us to just be a fluke.

 

[Tombs]

I'm talking about applying your logic consistently. You're essentially claiming that by voting for Biden they WANTED everything that encompasses Biden. As if they saw Biden as all pros and no cons. But you don't get that in candidates. There's always some con that makes the candidate imperfect. Except if you might be so biased that you're incapable of seeing any faults. If you saw zero faults with Trump, it likely means you overlooked those faults because of the pros. And we can work with that. Does voting for Trump mean you agree with men going out and ****ing porn stars while their wife is pregnant? The other side would say you do, because they're applying the same logic to you.

Voting for an imperfect candidate does not mean that you WANT those imperfections. It may mean that you overlooked them because of whatever pros there are, or because you think the imperfections in the other candidate are much worse. When I voted for Trump I was not voting FOR those characteristics, I didn't WANT them.

I'm disagreeing with the statement that they WANTED gun control. That's just an "othering" mechanism. It's more likely that they had serious TDS for Trump and foolishly believe/believed that Biden was harmless. If you go back and look at their own justifications, that's pretty much what was said. "Trump is too poopy to be muh prez, Biden won't be able to get gun control passed."

I didn't vote for a saint, I voted for a political platform I wanted.
If you're voting for the personality rather than the platform, you're missing the entire point of an election and civics in this country in general.

"Othering..." You mean like saying we're categorically and innately evil for the color of our skin?

Biden's platform had forcing all gun owners to pay a $200 tax PER semi-auto, and per magazine over 10 rounds, as a centerpiece of his policy agenda. If you don't want that, and you don't want Trump, guess what? There's more than 2 parties in this country. You don't get a line item vote, it's all or nothing.

 

[Ingomike]

Umm, that not how you recover from an infection; it not like you can just breathe it out and be healthy again.

The ignorance in this post indicates a true lack of understanding of the body and its defenses. The nose hairs act as a filter and exhalation acts to expel, with the sneeze being the strongest expellation . The mask interferes with that natural bodily function.

 

[IndyDave1776]

I'm talking about applying your logic consistently. You're essentially claiming that by voting for Biden they WANTED everything that encompasses Biden. As if they saw Biden as all pros and no cons. But you don't get that in candidates. There's always some con that makes the candidate imperfect. Except if you might be so biased that you're incapable of seeing any faults. If you saw zero faults with Trump, it likely means you overlooked those faults because of the pros. And we can work with that. Does voting for Trump mean you agree with men going out and ****ing porn stars while their wife is pregnant? The other side would say you do, because they're applying the same logic to you.

Voting for an imperfect candidate does not mean that you WANT those imperfections. It may mean that you overlooked them because of whatever pros there are, or because you think the imperfections in the other candidate are much worse. When I voted for Trump I was not voting FOR those characteristics, I didn't WANT them.

I'm disagreeing with the statement that they WANTED gun control. That's just an "othering" mechanism. It's more likely that they had serious TDS for Trump and foolishly believe/believed that Biden was harmless. If you go back and look at their own justifications, that's pretty much what was said. "Trump is too poopy to be muh prez, Biden won't be able to get gun control passed."

If they opposed gun control then there is no sane excuse for voting for a man whose trademark issue is gun control who clearly expressed his intent to reducing us to possessing sharp sticks.

If your theory has any merit then these people ard too ****ing stupid to be voting.

 

[jamil]

I didn't vote for a saint, I voted for a political platform I wanted.
If you're voting for the personality rather than the platform, you're missing the entire point of an election and civics in this country in general.

"Othering..." You mean like saying we're categorically and innately evil for the color of our skin?

Biden's platform had forcing all gun owners to pay a $200 tax PER semi-auto, and per magazine over 10 rounds, as a centerpiece of his policy agenda. If you don't want that, and you don't want Trump, guess what? There's more than 2 parties in this country. You don't get a line item vote, it's all or nothing.

I don’t disagree with anything here.

 

[jamil]

If they opposed gun control then there is no sane excuse for voting for a man whose trademark issue is gun control who clearly expressed his intent to reducing us to possessing sharp sticks.

If your theory has any merit then these people ard too ****ing stupid to be voting.

1. It’s not a theory. It’s literally what they told is when we argued with them about voting for Biden.

2. I’m not excluding insanity as a reason for their choice.

 

[IndyDave1776]

1. It’s not a theory. It’s literally what they told is when we argued with them about voting for Biden.

2. I’m not excluding insanity as a reason for their choice.

By theory I meant attributing it to naivety or excusable ignorance, not the substance of the Biden platform or their stated responses.

 

[BugI02]

It didn’t look to me like he flipped out. It looked more like he challenged someone’s statement.

Body of work, hermano. I first noticed him above the background noise when he was trying to banish any mention of faith to the religion threads while insisting that his religion (atheism) could be talked about/invoked anywhere

 

[BugI02]

Back to real life, some Democrats believe that. That we’re the enemy. Not all. It’s the radical ones who see things only in black and white

Why does that sound so very parallel to 'Its only the radical Wahabbis that want to kill us' not all of Islam. If you're tolerant of the evil and just let someone else sub-contract, I fail to see the difference

 

[NKBJ]

Don't know who you guys are talking about but why wouldn't atheists be welcome in any discussion?

 

[BugI02]

Did I vote for Trumpian totalitarianism? No. I voted against the other candidates. I judged them as worse. But by your logic I WANTED it. Which of course is radical nonsense.

Are you not saying you preferred 'Trumpian totalitarianism' to the alternative? Cannot that be construed as you wanting it (compared to the alternative)?

It was a conscious, affirmative choice

 

[BugI02]

Don't know who you guys are talking about but why wouldn't atheists be welcome in any discussion?

Why wouldn't Christians?

 

[NKBJ]

Why wouldn't Christians?

Christians get excluded (attacked and marginalized) because politically they can present a cohesive block that promotes stability as well as resisting evil.
You have to get them involved in left versus right to derail them from good versus evil. That's what evil people do, derail the opposition to evil because otherwise there can be no clear path forward for doing evil.
As for atheists, I think that six or seven out of ten they want good, the same average as for everybody else. And, they tend to actually think (what a refreshing change for human kind), in examining the content of their knowledge in their quest for direction in their lives. But they are like the rest of humanity and readily accept what justifies their preferences and ignore what doesn't. That's the way people are.

OK, that probably dissed everybody off so I'll close with this.
Jesus is my Lord and as far as I know I fall short of making Him happy.
As far as the Biden passport goes, do you think Jesus would like it?

 

[Ziggidy]

Does voting for Trump mean you agree with men going out and ****ing porn stars while their wife is pregnant?

My take is that individuals are willing to give up their guns, their freedom, their liberties and their constitution because a president allegedly slept with a porn star while his wife was pregnant.

That incident is much more important that China-Gate, Hunter's money laundering covered by daddy, Biden's mental status, Obamacare, job security, open borders, global dependency, our freedom and a multitude of other topics.

So far, IMO, no one has given any rational reason Biden should be president. WHY? Because there are none, nada, zero.

If anyone is surprised at what is happening to our country because of Biden, then you should not be allowed to vote in future elections - if there are any!

 

[Ziggidy]

 

[Ziggidy]

 

[vulindlela]

I will be vaccinated fully shortly after April 6th. I look forward to seeing my parents, now both vaccinated, in person.

Glad that you will be able to see your parents again.

I never stopped. Visit my 80 year old Dad weekly, and with no mask, and lots of hugs.
Also visit my 94 and 86 year old in laws often. Again, no masks and lots of hugs.