Vaccine coercion/bribery

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,190
    149
    Valparaiso


    Here’s the full video. 15 minutes in the doctor speaks.

    Thanks. As far as I can tell, he is licensed and there is no indication in my sources of any problems with his practice. That being said, I'm afraid that both sides will misconstrue some things he said. In addition, there is a lot unknown about COVID and he has a perspective, others have other perspectives. That CDC and others have acted as though they have all of the answers has been a mistake. I, personally, would appreciate more intellectual honesty (from everyone) about what are hypotheses and theories and what is fact.

    I wouldn't tell anyone to ignore what he said. However, I would also caution people that taking as gospel what 1 physician says, even a well-meaning one, and ignoring what other physicians say...because you agree with 1 side versus the other....isn't really a path to discovering whatever objective truth may be attainable.
     

    d.kaufman

    Still Here
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    130   0   0
    Mar 9, 2013
    15,812
    149
    Hobart
    I wouldn't tell anyone to ignore what he said. However, I would also caution people that taking as gospel what 1 physician says, even a well-meaning one, and ignoring what other physicians say...because you agree with 1 side versus the other....isn't really a path to discovering whatever objective truth may be attainable.
    Plenty of other physicians and Doctors saying the same thing. Big problem is they're being censored as what they are saying doesn't fit the "official" narrative. They're also being threatened with losing their medical licenses as well.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,190
    149
    Valparaiso
    Plenty of other physicians and Doctors saying the same thing. Big problem is they're being censored as what they are saying doesn't fit the "official" narrative. They're also being threatened with losing their medical licenses as well.
    Sure...and censorship is certainly not a positive thing. However, that still doesn't speak to the accuracy of their positions.

    "why would they want to silence them if they are wrong." Um....because they are wrong?

    Not taking sides in this post, but censorship ( in some form) is often not done to silence the truth, but to silence falsity because false claims are viewed as dangerous. That doesn't make it a good policy in any way, shape or form, but using censorship as some sort of admission of accuracy is not scientifically, or logically, valid.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,190
    149
    Valparaiso
    In a population with an extremely high vaccination rate, where do you think the infections will come from? Also, raw numbers versus population is more useful than a percentage of infections. How many total infections compared to the population?
     

    NKBJ

    at the ark
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 21, 2010
    6,240
    149
    Hmm, so what's next?
    Is the continuing emergency necessary for the great reset to succeed?
    The narrative is becoming somewhat worn and tattered, threatened with falling apart so will the coercion be cranked up? Perhaps something a little messier.
    Tune in next week; same bank time, same bank station.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    31,545
    113
    North Central
    Sure...and censorship is certainly not a positive thing. However, that still doesn't speak to the accuracy of their positions.

    "why would they want to silence them if they are wrong." Um....because they are wrong?

    Not taking sides in this post, but censorship ( in some form) is often not done to silence the truth, but to silence falsity because false claims are viewed as dangerous. That doesn't make it a good policy in any way, shape or form, but using censorship as some sort of admission of accuracy is not scientifically, or logically, valid.

    Please name the the regimes that were good for freedom while censoring speech? If one is speaking out in support of censorship then they are representing a side, there is no middle on censorship. Censorship is the antithesis of "peer review" and "peer review" is science...
     

    lovemachine

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    17   0   0
    Dec 14, 2009
    15,604
    119
    Indiana
    Please name the the regimes that were good for freedom while censoring speech? If one is speaking out in support of censorship then they are representing a side, there is no middle on censorship. Censorship is the antithesis of "peer review" and "peer review" is science...
    Censoring speech just means that .gov is looking out for our best interests.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,353
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Boy, Holcomb’s hopeful senate race polling must be really in the toilet thanks to his “pandemic” responses…
    He needs to talk to IU then.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,353
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Sure...and censorship is certainly not a positive thing. However, that still doesn't speak to the accuracy of their positions.

    "why would they want to silence them if they are wrong." Um....because they are wrong?

    Not taking sides in this post, but censorship ( in some form) is often not done to silence the truth, but to silence falsity because false claims are viewed as dangerous. That doesn't make it a good policy in any way, shape or form, but using censorship as some sort of admission of accuracy is not scientifically, or logically, valid.
    It would be more useful to me for Youtube to have left the video up, and for other experts to address each of this Dr's concerns, where and why they disagree with him. But no. We can't have nice things. Because we must shut down any dissent rather than rebutting it.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,353
    113
    Gtown-ish
    In a population with an extremely high vaccination rate, where do you think the infections will come from? Also, raw numbers versus population is more useful than a percentage of infections. How many total infections compared to the population?
    That's all understood. But it's useful to dispel the administrations misinformation that the un-vaccinated are causing the surge in cases, and that if they were all vaccinated, we wouldn't have a surge. There's a surge going on in many highly vaccinated communities. The administration's politicization is not helpful.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,294
    113
    Martinsville
    AxJblaP.jpg
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom