Vaccine coercion/bribery

[rob63]

I have enough sense to ignore most of what I see, knowing that I'm not really up on the current culture well enough to know when something is intended as a joke, but that was disturbing enough that I had to Google it to see if it was real or not. I was relieved to find it was a comedian.

 

[vulindlela]

 

[wtburnette]

This Is How Much The NIH Actually Cares About COVID-19

A new study by researchers at Johns Hopkins found a miniscule amount of the National Institutes of Health budget in 2020 went to clinical research on COVID-19.

dailycaller.com

 

[MRockwell]

Eric Clapton - Two Shots - Big Regrets 06142021 - Rumble

Interview with Eric Clapton and his experience with the shots.

 

[actaeon277]

Now it's "don't give unemployment benefits to the unvaxxed"

 

[ditcherman]

I wonder if he’d be willing to share those names and birthdates publicly?

 

[JCSR]

I have enough sense to ignore most of what I see, knowing that I'm not really up on the current culture well enough to know when something is intended as a joke, but that was disturbing enough that I had to Google it to see if it was real or not. I was relieved to find it was a comedian.

More to the story.

Biden Admin Brings Cross-Dressing TikTok Star to White House to Push COVID Vaccine​

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...hite-house-for-coronavirus-vaccine-promotion/

 

[DragonGunner]

Hospital where family works just told me 20 new covid patients admitted.....10 had the vaccine. Seems to be working.....?

 

[Lex Concord]

Actually surprised at the percentage of folks who told him to go **** up a rope.

 

[1DOWN4UP]

The Nuremberg Code​

1.The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

They hung Nazis for this.

 

[BigRed]

I used to find it amazing how folks in 1930s Germany would round up and turn in their neighbors because state said so.

After decades of the "see something say something" bull**** and the past year of this scam, I am not as amazed.

Some people are simply idiotic sheep.

 

[BigRed]

More to the story.

Biden Admin Brings Cross-Dressing TikTok Star to White House to Push COVID Vaccine​

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...hite-house-for-coronavirus-vaccine-promotion/

I figured michelle obama would have been worn out from the bday party.

 

[rhamersley]

I figured michelle obama would have been worn out from the bday party.

 

[1DOWN4UP]

The Nuremberg Code
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.

This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

The Nuremberg Code is the most important document in the history of the ethics of medical research.1-6 The Code was formulated 50 years ago, in August 1947, in Nuremberg, Germany, by American judges sitting in judgment of Nazi doctors accused of conducting murderous and torturous human experiments in the concentration camps (the so-called Doctors' Trial).7 It served as a blueprint for today's principles that ensure the rights of subjects in medical research. Because of its link with the horrors of World War II and the use of prisoners in Nazi concentration camps for medical experimentation, debate continues today about the authority of the Code, its applicability to modern medical research, and even its authorship.1,2,4,5,8 The chief prosecutor at the Doctors' Trial, General Telford Taylor, believed that one of the three U.S. judges, Harold Sebring, was the author of the Code.2 Two American physicians who helped prosecute the Nazi doctors at Nuremberg, Leo Alexander and Andrew Ivy, have each been identified as the Code's author.5,8-11 A careful reading of the transcript of the Doctors' Trial, background documents, and the final judgment reveals that authorship was shared and that the famous 10 principles of the Code grew out of the trial itself.

In this article, the important role that physicians had in the prosecution of the Nazi doctors and in the formulation of the Nuremberg Code and summarize how medical researchers have used the Code as a guide over the past five decades.

 

[actaeon277]

 

[actaeon277]

So, what reason are places giving for saying unvaxx'd should be tested each week?
So they won't spread the virus?

Cause, vaxx'd people transmit it also.

So what's the reason again?

 

[rob63]

More to the story.

Biden Admin Brings Cross-Dressing TikTok Star to White House to Push COVID Vaccine​

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...hite-house-for-coronavirus-vaccine-promotion/

I don't know which of these is the saddest commentary on society:

A) This person is an internet star.

B) The White House is occupied by people that actually believe this could convince reluctant people to get the vaccine.

C) The people that spent the last 4 years lecturing us about the lack of decorum in the WH due to mean tweets are perfectly ok with this.

 

[wtburnette]

So, what reason are places giving for saying unvaxx'd should be tested each week?
So they won't spread the virus?

Cause, vaxx'd people transmit it also.

So what's the reason again?

Control, control and control. Even though they know the virus can be spread by vaxxed and unvaxxed, they want everyone to have the jab so they're perfectly fine harrassing the people they want to do what they're telling them. They will browbeat us with whatever they want, blatantly lying and being hypocritical and the sheep will just keep on lapping it up and reporting their neighbors like good little nazis.

 

[NKBJ]

I don't know which of these is the saddest commentary on society:

A) This person is an internet star.

B) The White House is occupied by people that actually believe this could convince reluctant people to get the vaccine.

C) The people that spent the last 4 years lecturing us about the lack of decorum in the WH due to mean tweets are perfectly ok with this.

It's the mystery school thing; crossing up the sexes is oh so esteemed.

 

[vulindlela]

Actually surprised at the percentage of folks who told him to go **** up a rope.

Same here.
I like the first guy who calls it what it is.....fascism