Beat me to it! 58MB? That's a bunch.
Beat me to it! 58MB? That's a bunch.
0n April 3 , 2023, Richard M Allen made a phone call to his wife Kathy Allen. In that phone call, Richard M Allen admin several times that he killed Abby and Libby.
Investigators had the phone call transcribed and the transcription confirms that Richard M Allen admits that he committed the murders of Abigail Williams and Liberty German. He admits several times within the phone call that he committed the offenses as charged. His wife, Kathy Allen, ends the phone call abruptly
Wife and mother 5 times.Apparently it says elsewhere that he also confessed to his mother on the phone and that he has confessed to people on the phone no less than 5 times. I've seen screenshots of these claims in one of the docs. Surely he will change his plea if this isn't suppressed.
I’ve listened to people discuss the fact the calls are recorded and then start talking about committing the crime. I think a lot of people think it’s a bluff, or that nobody will take the time to listen to the calls.All of this was from prison where he knew all of his calls were being recorded?
I have a civil case filed by a prisoner where he is claiming an illegal search of his cell, his "legal mail" in particular, where his co-defendant (female) was in the same jail and they were conversing through notes delivered to each other against the rules and planning to cook her testimony in his favor using a code a 4 year old could break...then, he marked these noted legal mail and kept them.I’ve listened to people discuss the fact the calls are recorded and then start talking about committing the crime. I think a lot of people think it’s a bluff, or that nobody will take the time to listen to the calls.
He probably heard it from the same guy who thinks arrests are automatically invalidated if Miranda isn’t read.I have a civil case filed by a prisoner where he is claiming an illegal search of his cell, his "legal mail" in particular, where his co-defendant (female) was in the same jail and they were conversing through notes delivered to each other against the rules and planning to cook her testimony in his favor using a code a 4 year old could break...then, he marked these noted legal mail and kept them.
Which is probably a good thing.I was on the jury of a case involving a child molester. Reasonable doubt ended when they went through his recorded telephone conversations to his wife from the jail.... you know, where they have a big sign that reads "all calls are recorded" along with an audible reminder of the same within the call.
He was instructing his wife where to find evidence, how to destroy it, and what threats to deliver to witnesses.
Thugs can be plain stupid.
"Please be aware of phishing scams - if you get an email asking for your password, don't respond. We'll never ask you for that!"
And probably "reply all".A lot of people in prison have poor impulse control.
But as others have pointed out, it happens elsewhere too. It's a well known fact if you work in IT that if you send out a company wide email saying
then about 50% of the company will respond to THAT email with their password.
Which is probably a good thing.
"Yeah! I ****ing killed them! I did it! Is that what you want to hear!?! I did it ****!" **
Click. Wife hangs up abrubptly.
Is that a confession or a marital spat due to the situation? I don't know. But hearing the actual call vs. reading a transcript might make a difference in my interpretation. This guy looks dirtier and dirtier but there are still a lot of questions. For me, his defense lawyers agreeing to his own words being "incriminating" suggests just that, he's guilty. My parlay of plea deal and insanity defense grows stronger.
** completely made up quoate for demonstration.