The sketch artists will be on this one.I can see how it would become an issue with the possible explicit images.
Test the waters elsewhere before choosing a case like this.
Then again, freedom of speech and all that.
The sketch artists will be on this one.I can see how it would become an issue with the possible explicit images.
Test the waters elsewhere before choosing a case like this.
Then again, freedom of speech and all that.
I don't give a flying F about how he feels. I was just meaning that pics of the kids could show up and someone identify them. Could be by the outfit, the house surroundings or some other thing.Well you know we wouldn't want Keegan to be uncomfortable in front of the cameras or anything. That might be cruel to have him on camera before his sentencing.
I was reading of this on a different site. It was the first I'd heard of his "incriminating" statements. It's an interesting twist and goes well beyond the lone "magic bullet". His defense says he's made contradictory statements but that doesn't neccessarily mean the incriminating ones are false and the non-incriminating ones are true, so we'll see eventually.'Incriminating' statements, trial date set during Richard Allen's Delphi murders case hearing
'Incriminating' statements, trial date set during Richard Allen's Delphi murders case hearing
Allen was arrested last October and charged with the murders of Abby Williams and Libby German, whose bodies were found near the Delphi Monon High Bridge in 2017.www.wthr.com
Yeah, the prosecution was saying he confessed to the murders like 5 times while he's been in prison, but the defense says they were "generic confessions" whatever that means.I was reading of this on a different site. It was the first I'd heard of his "incriminating" statements. It's an interesting twist and goes well beyond the lone "magic bullet". His defense says he's made contradictory statements but that doesn't neccessarily mean the incriminating ones are false and the non-incriminating ones are true, so we'll see eventually.
...
The judge didn't entertain the motion to suppress the ballistic information about the unfired round.
That wasn't clear. It just wasn't acted upon today.Has that been decided then? She's not even considering it?
Yeah, prosecutors/police aren't above aggrandizing statements and such. But really, would any reasonable, truly innocent person ever give a statement that could be misconstrued as "I did it"?? I don't care how delirious or beaten down I was, if I were innocent there'd be no way my words could be interpreted as a confession. I might sound crazy, I might sound scared, whatever, but I would not sound guilty; nor do I think any reasonable (innocent) person would. I think this could be a real game changer that leads to a plea agreement.Yeah, the prosecution was saying he confessed to the murders like 5 times while he's been in prison, but the defense says they were "generic confessions" whatever that means.
The judge didn't entertain the motion to suppress the ballistic information about the unfired round.
WXIN article said judge moved that issue to another hearing, date TBD.Has that been decided then? She's not even considering it?
Yeah, prosecutors/police aren't above aggrandizing statements and such. But really, would any reasonable, truly innocent person ever give a statement that could be misconstrued as "I did it"?? I don't care how delirious or beaten down I was, if I were innocent there'd be no way my words could be interpreted as a confession. I might sound crazy, I might sound scared, whatever, but I would not sound guilty; nor do I think any reasonable (innocent) person would. I think this could be a real game changer that leads to a plea agreement.
Yeah, prosecutors/police aren't above aggrandizing statements and such. But really, would any reasonable, truly innocent person ever give a statement that could be misconstrued as "I did it"?? I don't care how delirious or beaten down I was, if I were innocent there'd be no way my words could be interpreted as a confession. I might sound crazy, I might sound scared, whatever, but I would not sound guilty; nor do I think any reasonable (innocent) person would. I think this could be a real game changer that leads to a plea agreement.
A lot of people do.Yeah, prosecutors/police aren't above aggrandizing statements and such. But really, would any reasonable, truly innocent person ever give a statement that could be misconstrued as "I did it"?? I don't care how delirious or beaten down I was, if I were innocent there'd be no way my words could be interpreted as a confession. I might sound crazy, I might sound scared, whatever, but I would not sound guilty; nor do I think any reasonable (innocent) person would. I think this could be a real game changer that leads to a plea agreement.
You would be very wrong. A lot of people have confessed to crimes they didn't commit, both from physical torture and mental.Yeah, prosecutors/police aren't above aggrandizing statements and such. But really, would any reasonable, truly innocent person ever give a statement that could be misconstrued as "I did it"?? I don't care how delirious or beaten down I was, if I were innocent there'd be no way my words could be interpreted as a confession. I might sound crazy, I might sound scared, whatever, but I would not sound guilty; nor do I think any reasonable (innocent) person would. I think this could be a real game changer that leads to a plea agreement.
No disrespect meant, but that's one of those situations that you might think you know, but you really might not know until you're in it. False confessions happen.Yeah, prosecutors/police aren't above aggrandizing statements and such. But really, would any reasonable, truly innocent person ever give a statement that could be misconstrued as "I did it"?? I don't care how delirious or beaten down I was, if I were innocent there'd be no way my words could be interpreted as a confession. I might sound crazy, I might sound scared, whatever, but I would not sound guilty; nor do I think any reasonable (innocent) person would. I think this could be a real game changer that leads to a plea agreement.
The defense is focusing on the forensics around the live round. (Question for our INGO Lawyer-types: ) If that gets thrown out, does the prosecution's case take a severe hit?
Sure. I'm not speaking of the loons that confess to crimes they didn't commit. And unless the Indiana authorities have been physically and mentally torturing this guy(??), that doesn't come into play. I'm speaking of sitting on my couch, door crashes in, police arrest me for murdering two children -that I factually did not murder- and I'm now sitting in jail, without torture. No, I would not make statements that could be misconstrued as a "confession". I'm might be crying, hysterical, in mental shock and screaming out of my ass, but a confession? No. Now, throw in some water boarding, tooth grinding, electro-shock and maybe I admit to killing JFK. I think these "incriminating" statements are a real game changer for this case. A normal 50yo man that did not kill two children is highly unlikely to "confess" to such, sans torture.You would be very wrong. A lot of people have confessed to crimes they didn't commit, both from physical torture and mental.