trump

[JettaKnight]

The whole ordeal is a joke since the candidate isn't qualified.

If people want to blow their vote for a worthless candidate, it's no one's fault but their own.

FIFY.

 

[Tombs]

Holy ****. Okay, so you're saying let's elect the scammer, because it's really the victim's fault they got scammed. I agree that the victims share a lot of responsibility for betting scammed. A fool and his money are soon parted, and all that. But I'd rather not promote the scammer to POTUS!

If you blow your life savings on a get rich quick scheme that requires work on your part in a sink or swim market, from a university that is not accredited, I don't believe you're being scammed.

You know up front what you're doing. Pointing fingers after the fact because you weren't handed billions of dollars is not the fault of anyone but yourself.

Should there be a lawsuit against this guy?

 

[Jludo]

If you blow your life savings on a get rich quick scheme that requires work on your part in a sink or swim market, from a university that is not accredited, I don't believe you're being scammed.

You know up front what you're doing. Pointing fingers after the fact because you weren't handed billions of dollars is not the fault of anyone but yourself.

Should there be a lawsuit against this guy?

Do you want that guy leading the free world?

 

[Tombs]

Do you want that guy leading the free world?

I'd rather have him lead the free world than the current options, what's your point?

 

[indiucky]

Do you want that guy leading the free world?

If he ran in the primary and then got nominated then yes.....

 

[chipbennett]

im not sure that word means what you think it does

No, it actually means exactly what I think it does: scientifically valid polls are being replaced with agenda-driven push polls. Look at who is conducting the polls, and study their internals.

 

[T.Lex]

No, it actually means exactly what I think it does: scientifically valid polls are being replaced with agenda-driven push polls. Look at who is conducting the polls, and study their internals.

Yeah, but that's been around a long time. I totally agree, though - particularly when a poll presents results that appear to be outliers.

 

[chipbennett]

I disagreed with your no-bounce theory when I read it, but it wasn't interesting enough to research it.

But, I just found where Paul Manafort disagrees with you.
Trump camp: We expected drop in polls - POLITICO

Now, if I'm being honest, if you told me the sky was purple outside, I'd believe you until I had a chance to check for myself. If Manafort told be the sky was blue outside, I'd immediately wonder what color it really was.

There are opinions, and then there are the actual numbers (from Gallup, as reported by Politico):

Why Trump and Clinton might not get a convention bounce - POLITICO

2000 was the last election to see candidates get a meaningful post-convention bounce. Bush didn't get one in 2004. Obama didn't get one in 2008 or 2012.

 

[chipbennett]

Do you want that guy leading the free world?

What does that have to do with the legitimacy of a fraud lawsuit?

 

[jamil]

What does that have to do with the legitimacy of a fraud lawsuit?

It seems obvious to me. Is the kind of person who would be sued successfully for fraud a suitable candidate for the Presidency? Hillary Clinton has some marks on her resume that makes her unsuitable as well.

 

[Kutnupe14]

What does that have to do with the legitimacy of a fraud lawsuit?

Yeah Chip, I'm kinda with Jamil on that one. It seems an obvious fitness test for the position.

 

[nate77]

When the polls aren't going your way, just tweak them.

Rigging an Election -- After Reuters "Tweaks" Poll, Hillary Lead Over Trump Surges

 

[ArcadiaGP]

because news

 

[jamil]

because news

Are you kidding? Little kid suited up like a pundit playah. Got his "serious" face on. Trump badge. C'mon. You can't help but think that's adorable.

 

[T.Lex]

Going left to right, I'm pretty much stuck on left.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Are you kidding? Little kid suited up like a pundit playah. Got his "serious" face on. Trump badge. C'mon. You can't help but think that's adorable.

Yes, a smartly dressed jugend.

 

[BugI02]

Just because Blonde/Blue eyes?

I'm a little disappointed in Kut but live in too glass of a house to cast any stones

 

[chipbennett]

It seems obvious to me. Is the kind of person who would be sued successfully for fraud a suitable candidate for the Presidency? Hillary Clinton has some marks on her resume that makes her unsuitable as well.

Yeah Chip, I'm kinda with Jamil on that one. It seems an obvious fitness test for the position.

Again: the particular point of discussion was the legitimacy of the fraud lawsuit. Either that point was missed, or you're begging the question.

Even then: Trump has not yet been successfully sued. And even if he is, that result isn't necessarily relevant. Jesse Ventura successfully sued Chris Kyle's widow, and that outcome proved absolutely nothing, other than that Jesse Ventura is an *******, and anybody can win a lawsuit for anything.

 

[chipbennett]

Going left to right, I'm pretty much stuck on left.

You do have good taste.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Just because Blonde/Blue eyes?

I'm a little disappointed in Kut but live in too glass of a house to cast any stones

Uhhhh, not quite. When I see kids that age talking political discourse, I can't help but think that they've been indoctrinated. He's a kid, let him be a kid. He has plenty of time to kick over trash cans, cuss at the tv, and think about the doom befalling future generations.