The Libertarian Party Race is Filling Up?

[mrjarrell]

William Weld has won the nomination for the VP slot by a bare majority, just over 50%.

 

[Twangbanger]

William Weld has won the nomination for the VP slot by a bare majority, just over 50%.

I guess that $100 Million from the Koch Brothers was bound to bubble up somewhere.

Blub, blub.

 

[bwframe]

William Weld has won the nomination for the VP slot by a bare majority, just over 50%.

Hopefully this will help influence folks to make better voting decisions for our Second Amendment, which should be priority one to anyone reading this forum.

 

[mrjarrell]

Weld wasn't my first choice, but his selection is not going to sway me to vote for that turd Trump or Hillary. I'll still cast a vote for Johnson. VP doesn't make much of an impact on a race or a presidency and Weld has already said he regrets his past actions and agrees with Heller and that gun ownership is an individual right. You republicans got over Romney's actions and you're ignoring Trumps past positions, so I'd say Weld is a pretty safe bet. I'll trust libertarians to protect my rights before I'd trust a republican or democrat.

 

[bwframe]

...I'll trust libertarians to protect my rights before I'd trust a republican or democrat.

I might too, if they had any chance of defeating our enemy. Sadly they don't.

A vote for the Libertarian is a vote for a Hillary victory and the end of the Second Amendment as we know it.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

I might too, if they had any chance of defeating our enemy. Sadly they don't.

A vote for the Libertarian is a vote for a Hillary victory and the end of the Second Amendment as we know it.

Or, A vote for the Libertarian is a vote for a Trump victory and the end of the....

Why does no one ever see it that way? Or has everyone agreed that Trump is the losing one, and shouldn't be the candidate? Pick one, can't have it both ways.

 

[Dead Duck]

Or, A vote for the Libertarian is a vote for a Trump victory and the end of the....

Why does no one ever see it that way? Or has everyone agreed that Trump is the losing one, and shouldn't be the candidate? Pick one, can't have it both ways.

Because that scenario makes absolutely no sense at all.

Chess anyone?

 

[mrjarrell]

I might too, if they had any chance of defeating our enemy. Sadly they don't.

A vote for the Libertarian is a vote for a Hillary victory and the end of the Second Amendment as we know it.

A vote for the libertarian candidate is a vote for the libertarian candidate. That old canard is untrue in the extreme. You folks are running a huge turd, and you did so willingly. I will not partake of that particular sandwich. Enjoy your bad breath.

 

[Jludo]

I might too, if they had any chance of defeating our enemy. Sadly they don't.

A vote for the Libertarian is a vote for a Hillary victory and the end of the Second Amendment as we know it.

Libertarians pull equally from democrats as republicans.

 

[Dead Duck]

I'll play-

Don't like Trump? OK.
How can we make sure Trump doesn't win? - as in - Who has positively the best chance of flat out beating Trump in this election?

*Hint- Voting for the 4% won't do it.




Shoe's on the other foot, now what?
It's OK to lose some Pawns.

 

[bwframe]

A vote for the libertarian candidate is a vote for the libertarian candidate. That old canard is untrue in the extreme. You folks are running a huge turd, and you did so willingly. I will not partake of that particular sandwich. Enjoy your bad breath.

There's room on our backs to carry your neglect for the Second Amendment.
Just like in the past, we won't forget that neglect though.

 

[Jludo]

A vote for the lesser of evils always leaves you with more evil.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

There's room on our backs to carry your neglect for the Second Amendment.
Just like in the past, we won't forget that neglect though.

Careful playing that game. I don't forget what either of the main candidates have said about 2A. There's a lot of selective memory going on in regards to one candidate in particular.

 

[bwframe]

There's room on our backs to carry your neglect for the Second Amendment.
Just like in the past, we won't forget that neglect though.

Careful playing that game. I don't forget what either of the main candidates have said about 2A. There's a lot of selective memory going on in regards to one candidate in particular.

There is only one choice. Vote against gun control or for it. Most can get by themselves and see this.

 

[Jludo]

There is only one choice. Vote against gun control or for it. Most can get by themselves and see this.

Well there's a vote for it, a vote against it and a vote for who the hell knows what he'd actually do in office...

 

[mrjarrell]

There is only one choice. Vote against gun control or for it. Most can get by themselves and see this.

There's more than one choice, or are not paying attention? The LP has a better stance onthe 2nd than republicans or their dem buddies. I'll take my chances with people who actually support the 2nd as it reads.

 

[cobber]

A vote for the lesser of evils always leaves you with more evil.

So if I vote for the greater of two evils, I'll get LESS evil?

Sounds like a plan then!

 

[Tombs]

So how are things going over here?

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

So if I vote for the greater of two evils, I'll get LESS evil?

Sounds like a plan then!

Hey now, this time you get the choice from among three evils. 50% more evil at the same price...ain't America great.........again?

 

[mrjarrell]

Super PAC money being made available to Johnson's race.

Libertarian ticket will get super-PAC support | TheHill