The insane Social Justice Thread III

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    ChristianPatriot

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    28   0   0
    Feb 11, 2013
    13,198
    113
    Clifford, IN
    Hey! Stop that! I can post in 280 characters!

    So anyway, the whole spiel about "silence is murder" is postmondern nonsense. And does it make sense? No. They'll tell you "speach is violence" and then when you don't say the words you're supposed to say it's "silence is violence."

    Also, destroying private property and looting is not violence. See how that works?
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,665
    149
    Earth
    Oh, please I wish people could just stop thinking with their feels so much. Yeah, Brees is not so much picking a side as he is viewing the situation from his own worldview. Brees explained why he didn't like seeing people kneel. And that's perfectly legit. Louis is judging the way Brees looks at things from his own point of view instead of Brees's point of view.. So then he conclude that Brees must not care. Well, have you asked? Saying you don't like to see people kneel for the national them isn't saying you don't care. More than one thing can be true at a time. And then the worst part is, "silence is murder?" Seriously? No. Really. Silence is literally NOT MURDER! People uncritically accept that premise just because someone says it.

    And the other dude is saying something very similar, that Brees must not empathize with their pain because he doesn't agree with that particular way of protesting.

    I'm afraid that represents a lot of people's viewpoints on the subject. This country is ****ed if **** like that is so easily digested and accepted so uncritically.

    I've got bad news for you pal.
     

    Hoosierkav

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Dec 1, 2012
    1,013
    22
    South of Indianapolis
    Ellen DeGeneres criticized for deleted tweet about protests saying 'people of color'

    Are you just now getting used to using the preferred term of the SJW leftist, "people of color?"

    Too bad. That's out now cause a rich white lady used it. We're going back to saying "black."

    But I thought it was supposed to be African American. I'm so confused.

    I guess Blacks are the only people who need things to change... ? I thought "people of color" meant everyone but White?
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    Just another example that "brand" couldn't give less of a **** about anything.

    9nqdfsjfws251.jpg
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    112,593
    149
    Southside Indy
    Ellen DeGeneres criticized for deleted tweet about protests saying 'people of color'

    Are you just now getting used to using the preferred term of the SJW leftist, "people of color?"

    Too bad. That's out now cause a rich white lady used it. We're going back to saying "black."

    But I thought it was supposed to be African American. I'm so confused.

    They don't want to share the limelight with people of "other" colors. Because clearly, only one color experiences discrimination.
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    Mobile at the moment, no links

    Seeing many articles and hot takes calling "racism" and "white supremacy" lethal public health issues.

    My question, what do they stand to gain trying to categorize racism as a sickness?
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,759
    113
    Uranus
    Mobile at the moment, no links

    Seeing many articles and hot takes calling "racism" and "white supremacy" lethal public health issues.

    My question, what do they stand to gain trying to categorize racism as a sickness?


    Did you see what Van Jones said about the "white virus"? Seems like a push here.

    "It's not the racist white person who is in the Ku Klux Klan that we have to worry about. It's the white liberal Hillary Clinton supporter walking her dog in Central Park who would tell you right now, you know, people like that – 'oh, I don't see race, race is no big deal to me, I see us all as the same, I give to charities.'

    But the minute she sees a black man who she does not respect or who she has a slight thought against, she weaponized race like she had been trained by the Aryan Nation.

    A Klan member could not have been better trained to pick up the phone and tell the police, 'It's a black man, African-American man, come get him.' So even the most liberal, well-intentioned white person has a virus in his or her brain that can be activated at an instant."


    https://disrn.com/news/cnns-van-jones-even-the-most-well-intentioned-white-person-has-a-virus-in-his-or-her-brain
     

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,665
    149
    Earth
    Mobile at the moment, no links

    Seeing many articles and hot takes calling "racism" and "white supremacy" lethal public health issues.

    My question, what do they stand to gain trying to categorize racism as a sickness?

    If it's a sickness they can get funding to study it as a "public health crisis." Like they're already trying to do with guns and "gun violence."
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom