Don't know how to break it to you but MM in Roman numerals is 2000 and the Romans did not multiply the same way we dowe can credit Romans for the MM as an abbreviation for million
Don't know how to break it to you but MM in Roman numerals is 2000 and the Romans did not multiply the same way we dowe can credit Romans for the MM as an abbreviation for million
Now do you and DeSantisI have a strong feeling that those who cannot accept defeat in 2020 will surely claim with full confidence that the same happened in 24. Much like Trump, you never acknowledge defeat, you just call people and demand they find you the votes.
So you believe Trump still has a chance to be declared the winner of the 2020 election.So, just lie back and enjoy it, eh?
That will certainly keep them from trying the same playbook again. No wonder republicans have to be taught how to fight, they are the weak men that good times create
Wow. Another amazing rebuttal...oops...I mean admissionNow do you and DeSantis
What has he lost?Now do you and DeSantis
CNN and NYT are not reliable sources. The General was not credible. I don’t know about the whistleblowers. Schiff said there were whistleblowers against Trump too. Did these whistleblowers testify under oath?What would you consider “proof”? Government whistleblowers, former generals from DOD that are now blackballed and worse, or as I often say to you a NYT or CNN report?
Did you search all the synonyms?I keep asking you to stop accusing me of saying things I did not. A INGO search by my user name indicates that I have never used the word “reinstated” in the Trump context, however the same search reveals that you use the word often with around TEN uses in the Trump context. Sounds like you have a fetish you try to push on others…
You make too many assumptions. It requires Trump to work with his own party, which is something he couldn’t do other than appointing the judges they wanted anyway.And how would he do that? Does FedGov have authority over state's elections?
Do you want them to?
Maybe an EO?
In order to sample a tasty Trump critique, you'll even take the opposite of your earlier viewpoints. Be careful what you wish for
So is revenge the right play? Seems like a Republican President should be able to work with the state party leaders to work and improve election policies across Red states and swing states.So, just lie back and enjoy it, eh?
That will certainly keep them from trying the same playbook again. No wonder republicans have to be taught how to fight, they are the weak men that good times create
Break it to the site I got it from then.Don't know how to break it to you but MM in Roman numerals is 2000 and the Romans did not multiply the same way we do
Any political futureWhat has he lost?
Backing and fillingYou make too many assumptions. It requires Trump to work with his own party, which is something he couldn’t do other than appointing the judges they wanted anyway.
Are you saying beat them so badly with their own stick that they will never want that again is NOT the right play?So is revenge the right play? Seems like a Republican President should be able to work with the state party leaders to work and improve election policies across Red states and swing states.
Break it to the site I got it from then.
It’s not math. It’s notation.A Different Kind of Multiplication
The ancient Romans had a cumbersome notation for numbers, but used a fairly sophisticated method for multiplying them, described herewww.phy6.org
You tell me. The proclaimed victor claimed 81MM legitimate votes. BS. So, tell me, how many votes did Bidiot's Team manufacture? Demands for proof of claims can go both ways. If I spent 2 billion dollars to acquire a four-year job that pays $400K and I believed I won that job with the most votes in history, I'd be bragging, showing, showing-off and rubbing-in the evidence. Weird the response from the winner(s) in this instance. Hmm.How many?
Without getting into to the weeds.... more votes than voters. Enjoy squaring that round peg. Heck, that's before any nitty-gritty details of overt, blatant election fraud. You can hate the Orange Man, HK, it's easy to do. But closing your eyes to the obvious.... unless you believe in the 81MM legitimate votes...eish.I have a strong feeling that those who cannot accept defeat in 2020 will surely claim with full confidence that the same happened in 24. Much like Trump, you never acknowledge defeat, you just call people and demand they find you the votes.
Any and all respect, politically or otherwise. Too bad, really. I had hoped for more/better from him.What has he lost?
I use "K""for thousand and 'mil" for million. $3K. $3 thousand. $3 mil. $3 million.
Probably the Primaries. I’m not even sure he can win FL. Last I saw Trump had a lead over him there.What has he lost?
I may be wrong but I do think Ramaswamy is sincerely America first. I’ve been quite skeptical of him, but his passion seems legit.You tell me. The proclaimed victor claimed 81MM legitimate votes. BS. So, tell me, how many votes did Bidiot's Team manufacture? Demands for proof of claims can go both ways. If I spent 2 billion dollars to acquire a four-year job that pays $400K and I believed I won that job with the most votes in history, I'd be bragging, showing, showing-off and rubbing-in the evidence. Weird the response from the winner(s) in this instance. Hmm.
Without getting into to the weeds.... more votes than voters. Enjoy squaring that round peg. Heck, that's before any nitty-gritty details of overt, blatant election fraud. You can hate the Orange Man, HK, it's easy to do. But closing your eyes to the obvious.... unless you believe in the 81MM legitimate votes...eish.
Any and all respect, politically or otherwise. Too bad, really. I had hoped for more/better from him.
As to this thread, 'Swamy is my distant 2nd. I want to like him more. He's way ahead of my 3rd, but he's still a very distant 2nd, at this point.