LeftyGunner
Sharpshooter
Isn't that just a convenient way to ignore it? Back in 2020 during the george floyd riots, federal property was dammaged. Bar aggressively investigated and prosecuted the perpetrators. After Biden took office the DoJ dropped the cases. There were plenty of articles posted here.
I didn’t pay much attention to the riots in other towns and, honestly the fate of the rioters didn’t interest me much, so this one slid right past me...my bad.
The Portland rioters are still being prosecuted in state court for the laws they broke. I think state charges are most appropriate in the bulk of these cases…perhaps even all of them…local thuggery isn’t a federal issue.
I'd add a little more complexity to that. Charges where charges are appropriate, and, prosecute everyone equally under the law. That's not happening. Saying you don't like the NDA's is a cop out. It's like throwing your hands up, well, whatdyagonna do? and then going back to caring about prosecuting the one you actually care about.
I agree entirely with this. Everyone should be prosecuted equally under the law.
For example, I agree that failing to follow through on valid criminal prosecutions is a miscarriage of Justice and a betrayal of the public trust.
However, failing to prosecute Hillary for her crimes is not a valid reason to excuse Trump for his.
…to the rest of your point, I’m not sure what you mean by a cop out. It my view that public business should be done in a public forum, subject to public record and public review…to me, this is especially important in the business of prosecuting criminals.
Would be nice to have a legal definition of insurrection.
View attachment 290736
The law doesn't define it. It just refers to it.
insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt. An insurrection may facilitate or bring about a revolution, which is a radical change in the form of government or political system of a state, and it may be initiated or provoked by an act of sedition, which is an incitement to revolt or rebellion.Insurrection | Definition, Laws, Examples, & Facts
Insurrection, an organized and usually violent act of revolt or rebellion against an established government or governing authority of a nation-state or other political entity by a group of its citizens or subjects; also, any act of engaging in such a revolt.www.britannica.com
Okay, I can work with this. Fair.
I think a few of the people who entered the capital could reasonably be charged with insurrection.
So do I...that’s the point I have been arguing this whole time.
But to say that J6 was entirely an insurrection is indeed hyperbole.
…and I haven‘t. You and some other posters have made that leap for me. When I speak of insurrectionists I am not referring to the people who collected outside the capitol and then went home when things got out of control...those people were protestors.
This was a protest that turned into a riot. Some people entered the building. Some were invited in by Capitol Police! Most of the people who entered the Capitol though acted more like tourists than insurrectionists.
Tourists? Only if you ignore everything else going on around them.
If you are going to accuse me of cherry picking my supporting facts, please do less of it yourself.
Some of those people plead guilty because they were intimidated and threatened that they'd be charged with felonies if they didn't plea, when what they actually did was trespassing at most. Some were also charged with assault. Typical riot stuff. Most of the violence happened outside.
So…this is what happens when you entangle yourself with law enforcement, you get treated as a criminal suspect.
Every single one of those defendants had a right to a jury trial, a possible change of venue, appellate review of the handling of their case…etc.
Instead, they chose to admit to having committed the crimes with which they were charged.
At every step these consequences were their own choosing.
I think this is unreasonably dismissive. Did you not get the part about a different set of rules for one side and a different set of rules for the other? How hard did the media, the DoJ, and Democrats go after the George Floyd Rioters who breached the White House grounds, destroyed property, set fires, and violently assaulted secret service officers? On White House grounds? Does that not fit your definition of an insurrection? And are you asserting that DC jurors would not be much more likely to convict than, say, Indiana jurors?
Noted.
There were dozens of arrests following the riots in DC.
It should also be noted those criminal cases (or lack thereof) were prosecuted under the Trump administration, not Obama or Biden.
I mean, look at the language you're using. You keep calling them insurrectionists while separating out the possibility that some insurrectionists didn't commit a crime? I mean, read that again and tell me that sounds like it's made in good faith.
You admitted that some of them could reasonably be called insurrectionists based on their actions…let’s stick to those people.
I know many firearms were confiscated. There was some discussion here recently about that even. What I'm addressing was that it was not an armed insurrection, even though some people got caught with weapons on Capitol grounds. Those people should be charged and were.
We are in total agreement on these points.
Let me just say this again, since you like to say that so often. It's hyperbolic to say the whole protest was an insurrection, which you seem to be doing. For a large majority of the people who participated on J6, they were just there to protest the election. Some people were there for for years nefarious purposes. I think as a whole, when you watch all the available video it's more accurate to call what happened a riot. And for a few it's probably fair to say they were insurrectionists. They intended to use violence to prevent the certification of electors.
Then I’ll say this again…I am only referring to the rioters that entered the capitol and interrupted the joint session of congress as Insurrectionists.