If the Constitution is flawed, it most certainly is NOT because it failed to bestow rights to other people's money.
I think the flaw he was referring to was racism.
If the Constitution is flawed, it most certainly is NOT because it failed to bestow rights to other people's money.
I think the flaw he was referring to was racism.
That is a bunch of happy horseshit.I think the flaw he was referring to was racism.
Obama said the Civil Rights Movement failed by way of the Supreme Court not instituting a redistribution of wealth and that the Constitution is flawed because it doesn't state what the Federal Government "must do" on our behalf.? I am confused. Please explain.
Megyn Kelly kicks ass, in oh so many ways.Oh...and just for fun, a SMACKDOWN:
The question I have, is why should we redistribute our wealth?
Are we to reward people who are not able to be successful?
We have too many welfare families to begin with.
The question I have, is why should we redistribute our wealth?
Are we to reward people who are not able to be successful?
We have too many welfare families to begin with.
Comrade, you do not understand correctly, therefore you will have to be re-educated by the Obama thought police. If you survive that, you will them gladly donate all your earnings to the greater good. It's patriotic, haven't you heard?
Tax breaks for oil companies are redistributions of wealth. Tax breaks for pharmaceutical companies are redistributions of wealth. The current system redistributes our collective wealth up. Why are you okay with redistributing our wealth up to a chosen few who already have the majority of wealth?
Were you screaming socialism when our economic stimulus checks were mailed this spring? Were you screaming socialism when the government effectively socialized major banks and the mortgage industry within the last month?
Absolute, unadulterated, class warfare rubbish. Letting companies or individuals keep THEIR money that THEY earned through selling goods and services is NOT redistribution of wealth. Giving individuals or companies tax money collected from OTHER individuals or companies that the first group did NOT earn and did not pay into IS redistribution of wealth. There is a huge difference.
YES, YES, and hell YES. Read my posts on that damned "bailout." I don't believe in socialism for you, me, the guy down the street or for supermegabank.
How much money do you have to make to be middle class these days? All of these references to middle class and I don't know what that is anymore.
The fundamental flaw in this country, and in the Constitution, according to Obama, is racism. The failing of the civil rights movement was not fighting in the courts to get wealth to the lowest classes. It is hard to be equal when you are starting with huge disparities. Freed slaves had nothing. It is awfully hard to get something when starting with nothing. Wealth begets wealth. It was nearly impossible for black people to get anything when they started with nothing AND had to fight racist business owners.
To repeat, racism is the fundamental flaw in the Constitution. Obama thinks one way to help get over it is to provide a base for the lowest classes to start from.