Where is black lives matter on this?
Stormfront, I hear has a thread on that.
Where is black lives matter on this?
Stormfront, I hear has a thread on that.
People bring them up to stir the pot.I do not see why the "Black Lives Matter" movement would care about Finicum as the notion of a black race appears to be one of their central issues and Finicum was fair skinned. Some of the supporters of the "Black Lives Matter" movement were pretty vocal in wanting violence to come upon the refuge protesters, but I write that off as simple racism and they have a right to speak their mind just like the rest of us do.
The Bundys argue that the Oregon Occupation was a constitutionally protected act of assembly and political dissent.
Bundy brothers' motion for pretrial release previews their defense in Oregon standoff case | OregonLive.com
I dunno. An armed takeover doesn't seem all that much like "a constitutionally protected act of assembly and political dissent".
I dunno. An armed takeover doesn't seem all that much like "a constitutionally protected act of assembly and political dissent".
I think the takeover part is more the operative word there than the armed part.So, in order to exercise one's First Amendment rights he/she must first surrender their Second Amendment rights?
So, in order to exercise one's First Amendment rights he/she must first surrender their Second Amendment rights?
No. They have a right to keep and bear arms. But is an armed takeover a protected right under the 2A? So they can take over a public facility and prevent the public from using it?
I agree with a lot of things they were protesting. I disagree with how they went about protesting. I also disagree with how the authorities set it up so that there would be an armed confrontation at the end.