Not really, just pointing out there’s a significant difference between him saying it’s none of his employers business and me asking why my health is someone else’s concern...Beavis, the grammar nazi.
FifySadly, MY president disagree.
This.Ah, so we can now discriminate against women of child bearing age, the overweight, the poor because that leads to poor health, gays (promiscuity is serious health risk), trans (not paying for all that chopping and sewing), black folks (greater propensity for accusations of racism and lawsuits), shall I continue?
Uhhh, visible in the Federal Register
And the one immediately after it makes it mandatory for federal employees
Are you talking about the navy again?This.
Make people exercise a certain amount each day.
Decide you can't have processed sugars.
Tell you you need your appendix removed regardless of what a doc says.
Require proof you've brushed your teeth 3 times a day, and the correct way.
and so on
and so on
If you look at the context, he was responding to this: "It's because the primary goal is apparently to vaccinate rather than to protect your health. One has to wonder why?"My question was in response to Jetta saying “getting vaccinated is protecting your health”. Why is my health his concern? I hope he doesn’t get diabetes, but if he does because he ate a Big Mac every day, I don’t care. His consequences are because of his choices, as are my own. It’s none of his business.
Also, if my company was REALLY concerned about my health, they'd probably shut the place down.
Nasty chemicals in the air.
High temperatures.
Machinery that crushes people.
Gases that kill people.
Shift work which has been claimed to shorten lifetime.
The list goes on.
This is missing context. That quote was my response to someone saying that their employer made mandate accommodations for those working from home (no interaction with the rest of the workforce) but then walked them back. The argument of protecting the health of their workforce no longer holds, unless by protecting they mean making everyone's health decisions for them to protect them from themselves.If you look at the context, he was responding to this: "It's because the primary goal is apparently to vaccinate rather than to protect your health. One has to wonder why?"
That is a false dichotomy and he was just picking up on the language he quoted.
Let's, perhaps, state it differently: "Here's a crazy thought - what if getting vaccinated was protecting health?"
That is the point.
An I don't have to kill anyone else when I exercise that right.My ****ing body
My ****ing choice
Not with the group mindthink.My ****ing body
My ****ing choice
Dang. I think another group of people use those lines....My ****ing body
My ****ing choice
The point he replied to was that it isn’t about health, it’s about pushing the vaccine because they’re enforcing mandates to people working from home.If you look at the context, he was responding to this: "It's because the primary goal is apparently to vaccinate rather than to protect your health. One has to wonder why?"
That is a false dichotomy and he was just picking up on the language he quoted.
Let's, perhaps, state it differently: "Here's a crazy thought - what if getting vaccinated was protecting health?"
That is the point.
That’s the point.Dang. I think another group of people use those lines....
oh yeah. Women.
I think you missed the connection. You couldn't throw out Roe with that argument.That’s the point.
It either is or it isn’t
I think the point he was making was that "my body, my choice" is considered to be infallible holy gospel by .gov when it comes to abortions. Yet "my body, my choice" is now considered "revolutionary", or "insurrectiony" or "white terroristy" or some such nonsense by .gov as it applies to these mandates.I think you missed the connection. You couldn't throw out Roe with that argument.
Can we force people to have an abortion?I think you missed the connection. You couldn't throw out Roe with that argument.