I'm sorry, you don't get to come into the middle of a discussion with your own strawman and then yell "Strawman", Beavis.Straw man. Not what I asked at all.
I'm sorry, you don't get to come into the middle of a discussion with your own strawman and then yell "Strawman", Beavis.Straw man. Not what I asked at all.
Well, quote it if you can find a vaccination mandate anywhere in there.Uhhh, visible in the Federal Register
And the one immediately after it makes it mandatory for federal employees
Asking a question to a statement is a straw man? I think you’ve been spending too much time on redditI'm sorry, you don't get to come into the middle of a discussion with your own strawman and then yell "Strawman", Beavis.
Actually, you were repeating the inital question as if it was a shocking new insight.Asking a question to a statement is a straw man? I think you’ve been spending too much time on reddit
I'll answer...on some level I care about the health or others, but I could not care less about whether you get a vaccine or not.Straw man. Not what I asked at all.
When did it become anyone elses job to make decisions that may affect your health for you?Here's a crazy thought - what if getting vaccinated was protecting your health?
I know, I know, it sound ridiculous to you.
It is quite enlightening to go back and read the discussions on wuwho flu in early 2020, or masks, or shutdowns, and now vaccine mandates. The exact same people are still pushing the government line, no matter what it is…
"There can be only one"No, I but have often wondered whether you were Bug's younger brother/sister/whatever.
I don't believe you. Your employer is going to opt for the judgement that ends the problem from their standpoint. They value their convenience over your rightsYou've taken a generalized statement by Actaeon and whittle the argument with a chainsaw to fit your agenda.
I stand by my staement, as conditional as it might be.
Look, an employer might believe government published data on infection, hospitalization and death rates from covid and make a judgement that the unvaccinated folks represent a higher potential level of expense for the company. And, if they do nothing, and someone dies as a result of exposure traced to an unvaccinated employee.....well, there's your answer. The employer is going to take the road that will lead to the least likely negative outcome.
Said AllpooBuckwater.....he probably meant Buckwanker.
Angle of insistence equals angle of deflectionYou are talking about heterosexual activity or something else?
If it's something else, I certainly do not wish to have to acquire brain bleach to continue the conversation.
I think that is what I intimated...perhaps without your required dose of cynicism.I don't believe you. Your employer is going to opt for the judgement that ends the problem from their standpoint. They value their convenience over your rights
Oh puleeze. If you want to be in the chat, you must be present. Do not attempt to bayonet the wounded after the battle is over. Ghoulish.Angle of insistence equals angle of deflection
I'm beyond mere doses. I require a minimum serum level of cynicism (and caffeine) at all timesI think that is what I intimated...perhaps without your required dose of cynicism.
That wasn’t a repeated question. That was a statement. I asked a question.
My question was in response to Jetta saying “getting vaccinated is protecting your health”. Why is my health his concern? I hope he doesn’t get diabetes, but if he does because he ate a Big Mac every day, I don’t care. His consequences are because of his choices, as are my own. It’s none of his business.I'll answer...on some level I care about the health or others, but I could not care less about whether you get a vaccine or not.
...but the point, speaking of logical fallacies, is that "taking care of ones health" vs. vaccination is a false dichotomy.