Sorry my pants are sagging, had to cut the belt loops off my jeans to be compliant with the new bump stock ban.
Trump just shot him self in the foot and likened his chances as a one term president.
Kind of like Bush #1
Sorry my pants are sagging, had to cut the belt loops off my jeans to be compliant with the new bump stock ban.
Trump just shot him self in the foot and likened his chances as a one term president.
It's like when the Dems said they weren't coming for our guns, and didn't. But the repubs said we are for gun rights and hearing protection and magazine capacity so we voted for them then they came for our guns and accessories and don't contest the thousands of accessory bans taking place locally making it almost impossible for us to get our rights back due to the sheer volume of small gun laws.. Well played overlords, well played
Theyll call the "brave" the ones who are kicking in the doors of true Patriots. Brave my ass. Thugs and gangsters are all they are if they try to take away guns, ammo, accessories.GOA is ready:
https://www.gunowners.org/goa-file-bump-stock-suit.htm
I can’t imagine the optics of seeing the Fed raid some poor schmuck’s house over a cheesy piece of plastic so they can send him up the river for 10 years. Yep, the land of the free and the home of the brave my ass.
And I hope people still are.The really stupid thing about this ban is you can make your own bump stock at home if you just google for instructions. I'd also love to hear how many Americans even knew what a bump stock was before the shooting last year.
Point of clarification - I'm pretty sure that joint-statement was from when the bumpstock ban was originally proposed. I want to say about a year ago.So, the NRA finally got the gun control that they asked for and CONTINUE to ask for. Please reference the 7th sentence in the paragraph on the linked page.
https://home.nra.org/joint-statement
Point of clarification - I'm pretty sure that joint-statement was from when the bumpstock ban was originally proposed. I want to say about a year ago.
I'm certainly open to being corrected on this, but I haven't seen a new statement from the NRA on this matter.
Word is tons of 3d printers are humming away for the past few weeks.And I hope people still are.
What next, I can't paint a rifle black? Or camo?
Word is tons of 3d printers are humming away for the past few weeks.
the only clean way out of this for the government is to re-open the registry. PERIOD
State does not exist to protect rights.
State exists to protect state.
Some say state is a necessary evil. They are half correct. It isn't necessary.
But it wouldn't be letting a few million "guns" into the transferable market would it? It would be letting a few million plastic accessories and some gun parts into the transferable market. I must be misunderstanding something.Agreed. While it would not be a truly constitutional solution, opening the machinegun registry for an amnesty push to allow the likely 1 million+ bumpstocks, newly classified as machineguns, would at least take care of the issue of citizens being deprived of property without due process. Of course, they don't want to do that, since they know that this will bring in at least a million new transferable machineguns (probably more, since a lot of people would just register a bunch of semi-autos, auto sears, trigger packs, etc) which would breath new life into the transferable machinegun world.
Machineguns are nearly priced out of most folks reach (and honestly, all but the lower tier guns already are out of reach to the vast majority of people). With less than 200,000 transferables (possibly way less) being held by a smaller number of aging, wealthy folks, I'm sure the ATF was hoping that the transferable market would effectively disappear in a few decades, as guns wore out and owners died, with their heirs not really caring about the guns. Let another few million guns into the registry, and you reset that clock back at least 40 years, as the market would be glutted with cheap transferables.