Hope you're right. But never underestimate someone's need for a new TV or sneakersI still don't see riots like BLM. Whoever is expecting "janes revenge" to be some country wide violent event is going to be disappointed.
I would expect them to more targeted, not a mass protest.I still don't see riots like BLM. Whoever is expecting "janes revenge" to be some country wide violent event is going to be disappointed.
Depends on the website...some say 6-3 some say 5-4So what was the vote?
Was it 5-4 like expected?
I was told on INGO that twitter does not have news…An interesting note on how this is being "covered" on Twitter (at least in my feed).
Twitter has commentary mostlyI was told on INGO that twitter does not have news…
Oh they will see some sights for sure…I just hope they're over this by next Friday when I fly to DC. Was hoping to take the grandkids to see some sights.
So what was the vote?
Was it 5-4 like expected?
So just like most media communications…Twitter has commentary mostly
exactlySo just like most media communications…
^^ This ^^5-4 to overturn Roe and Casey
6-3 to uphold the Mississippi Ban
Roberts is the difference, as he doesn't like Roe or Casey, but he doesn't like to overturn prior decisions either, so he would have just weakened Roe and Casey again and waited for another case. He liked to whittle away at the underpinnings rather than blow them up.
ALITO, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which THOMAS, GORSUCH, KAVANAUGH, and BARRETT, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., and KAVANAUGH, J., filed concurring opinions. ROBERTS, C. J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., filed a dissenting opinion.
Both the Court’s opinion and the dissent display a relentless freedom from doubt on the legal issue that I cannot share. I am not sure, for example, that a ban on terminating a pregnancy from the moment of conception must be treated the same under the Constitution as a ban after fifteen weeks.
...
I would decide the question we granted review to answer—whether the previously recognized abortion right bars all abortion restrictions prior to viability, such that a ban on abortions after fifteen weeks of pregnancy is necessarily unlawful. The answer to that question is no, and there is no need to go further to decide this case. I therefore concur only in the judgment.
Come Monday I bet there will be some classic videos on Tik Tok of people losing their ****. Example below.
That was a “woman”???If she got a nickel for ever time that was posted, she’d be giving Gates a run for his money.
Come Monday I bet there will be some classic videos on Tik Tok of people losing their ****. Example below.