Both dissents seek to characterize today’s decision as “fractured” in an effort to advance their own overbroad readings of Pike and layer their own gloss on opinions they do not join. Post, at 1, 8 (opinion of KAVANAUGH, J.); see also post at 2–4, 8–10 (opinion of ROBERTS , C. J.).
But the dissents are just that—dissents. Their glosses do not speak for the Court. Today, the Court unanimously disavows petitioners’ “almost per se” rule against laws with extraterritorial effects.
I often wonder if this ******* will do something useful one day.
Maybe he could anchor himself to the ocean floor and start a reef.
I often wonder if this ******* will do something useful one day.
Maybe he could anchor himself to the ocean floor and start a reef.
Good point. ****** is already poisoned most everything else.Why do you want to poison the ocean?