COVID OMICRON Thread

[Ingomike]

"Evidence has come to light strongly indicating that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are not really "vaccines" in the medical and legal sense of the word, but rather "experimental gene therapies." If proven true, the significance and legal ramifications of this allegation are profound."

What if the COVID-19 vaccines are not really vaccines?

Evidence has come to light strongly indicating that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are not really

www.americanthinker.com

As the esteemed John McClain once said, “welcome to the party pal”…

 

[Ingomike]

"Evidence has come to light strongly indicating that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are not really "vaccines" in the medical and legal sense of the word, but rather "experimental gene therapies." If proven true, the significance and legal ramifications of this allegation are profound."

What if the COVID-19 vaccines are not really vaccines?

Evidence has come to light strongly indicating that the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines are not really

www.americanthinker.com

@mbills2223 are you saying with your laugh this is the same as the vaccines most of us have had in the past? Is this not new technology? If it is not, why do the vaccine makers have all these patents on this? Many registered before we ever heard of covid?

 

[Ingomike]

Makes you wonder what data those here, who were/are pushing the vaccines so hard, were using...

No it does not make me wonder, I knew…

 

[wtburnette]

Wow. Heck of an article.

CDC Tells New York Times It Hid Covid Data For Political Reasons

Selectively cherry-picking ‘The Science’ to suit a political narrative is not ‘Following the Science.’ It is malpractice and fraud.

thefederalist.com

WHAT? They lied? I'm shocked. SHOCKED I SAY....

 

[bobzilla]

I’m sure we will here the same crickets we’ve been hearing from the normal ones that have been pushing the narrative. Horse dewormer. Science deniers etc.

 

[SheepDog4Life]

Wow. Heck of an article.

CDC Tells New York Times It Hid Covid Data For Political Reasons

Selectively cherry-picking ‘The Science’ to suit a political narrative is not ‘Following the Science.’ It is malpractice and fraud.

thefederalist.com

Somehow this quote from that article:

The article says when the Centers for Disease Control “published the first significant data on the effectiveness of boosters in adults younger than 65…it left out the numbers for a huge portion of that population: 18- to 49-year-olds, the group least likely to benefit from extra shots.”

Seems a little exaggerated compared to the actual NY Times article on the actual data released:

NY Times: Younger Americans Benefited Less From Booster Shots Than Older People

The risk of Covid death among Americans ages 18 to 49 was low. The rate was about 0.9 per 100,000 people among the unvaccinated, and plummeted to 0.03 among people who were vaccinated. With the addition of a booster, deaths were too low to measure.

Things that make you go hmmmm...

 

[wtburnette]

Somehow this quote from that article:


Seems a little exaggerated compared to the actual NY Times article on the actual data released:

NY Times: Younger Americans Benefited Less From Booster Shots Than Older People


Things that make you go hmmmm...

Some day we may actually know how many in that age range died due to the jab. If I was a betting man, I'd say that number will be higher than the number in that age range that died from the virus. Of course, the numbers have been fudged from the beginning, so we may not ever know.

 

[Ingomike]

Somehow this quote from that article:


Seems a little exaggerated compared to the actual NY Times article on the actual data released:

NY Times: Younger Americans Benefited Less From Booster Shots Than Older People


Things that make you go hmmmm...

We are dealing with known admitted liars, are they telling the truth now? The only part we can be sure of is that they lied…

 

[wtburnette]

We are dealing with known admitted liars, are they telling the truth now? The only part we can be sure of is that they lied…

Along with lying, they've been suppressing information, hand in hand with Big Pharma, the Media and Big Tech.

 

[jamil]

Makes you wonder what data those here, who were/are pushing the vaccines so hard, were using...

They weren't using data. They just pushed "the science". Without saying what that actually is. Like I've grown fond of saying recently the real data has ass-****ed "the science".

 

[jamil]

Somehow this quote from that article:


Seems a little exaggerated compared to the actual NY Times article on the actual data released:

NY Times: Younger Americans Benefited Less From Booster Shots Than Older People


Things that make you go hmmmm...

This is what the Federalist does. They're biased. But, I think the gist of what they've said comports with later studies that tend to show the CDC party line has been consistently wrong in the direction of supporting insane policies.

 

[SheepDog4Life]

This is what the Federalist does. They're biased. But, I think the gist of what they've said comports with later studies that tend to show the CDC party line has been consistently wrong in the direction of supporting insane policies.

I agree with that with regard to f****** lying Fauci and his ilk!

I think what some of the other academic types miss is that giving transparent and reliable information for individuals to allow them to make the best decision for themselves and their families generally leads to the best outcomes for society at large.

 

[hoosierdoc]

Ruined my streak. I saw a COVID case this week. I have had 30ish flu positives in the last five weeks and one COVID.

 

[JCSR]

Ruined my streak. I saw a COVID case this week. I have had 30ish flu positives in the last five weeks and one COVID.

 

[wtburnette]

I agree with that with regard to f****** lying Fauci and his ilk!

I think what some of the other academic types miss is that giving transparent and reliable information for individuals to allow them to make the best decision for themselves and their families generally leads to the best outcomes for society at large.

If that was what they wanted, they could have easily had it from the beginning. Sort of proves that wasn't the intent.

 

[ancjr]

 

[ancjr]

The future is here

 

[actaeon277]

And there are people that said, that would be good for us.

 

[actaeon277]

So, MORE supply chain issues.
Great!

 

[ancjr]

So, MORE supply chain issues.
Great!

The people that don't need to be elected to obtain office are taking notes I can assure you.