There is the troubling new youth-specific affliction that at least for now looks to be related to exposure to the novel coronavirus.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/05/06/kawasaki-disease-coronavirus/
Ingomike. He believes that they only prevent transmission in hamsters. You can judge how seriously to take him.
[video=youtube_share;cAy4zULKFDU]http://youtu.be/cAy4zULKFDU[/video]It is well known that hamsters are dirty ****ing liberals. None of them work, they just hang around waiting around to be fed. It's obvious that masks need to be tested on a more conservative animal that actually has a ****ing job, like a police K9 or a carrier pigeon. (As long it's a private carrier pigeon and not a GD communist socialist US Postal pigeon that should be allowed to fail)
But it's unlikely that we will ever be able to test masks on dogs, because obviously dogs aren't sheep.
I believe it does if a proper filter mask. standard cloth? maybe not. BUT, having a cloth mask on would limit you touching your face so there's probably benefit there.
can't wait for home made rope seat belts to come out. they can even look like normal seat belts. probably help "some", and be better than nothing
Is there anybody here that doesn't believe wearing a real mask reduces transmission of airborne viruses including the chinese virus to some degree by trapping the virus particles in the filter material?
GOP governor offers emotional plea to the anti-mask crowd: Stop this senseless culture war
“I would really love to see in North Dakota that we could just skip this thing that other parts of the nation are going through where they’re trading a divide — either it’s ideological or political or something — around masks versus no mask,” Burgum said. “This is a, I would say, senseless dividing line, and I would ask people to try to dial up your empathy and your understanding.”
That is the standard ideology of the Left. They give less than conservatives because they give for their benefit, not others. A combination of tax deduction and social approval encourages them to give. Take either one away and giving drops.
Conservatives tend to give to assist others. They are more generous because they give with an eye to what they can spare rather than how they can maximize their own benefit of tax deduction and social approval. They give for others, not for themselves.
Conservatives support food banks and Heifer International; Liberals support higher taxes so the less sophisticated who cannot find loopholes will support parks and museums.
It's all a matter of looking at others or looking at yourself.
To those that advocate required mask use, please explain what mask use will be required for going forward.
will we require it for flu? Colds? Or just what the media thinks we should wear one for?
What are the limits once we start this?
To those that advocate required mask use, please explain what mask use will be required for going forward.
will we require it for flu? Colds? Or just what the media thinks we should wear one for?
What are the limits once we start this?
Remember, a mask works both ways. If it can't filter out enough to keep you from catching it, it can't filter out enough to prevent you from spreading infection either.
Who is advocating required mask use?
I am beginning to wonder why doctors and painters even bother wearing masks.
[video=youtube_share;cAy4zULKFDU]http://youtu.be/cAy4zULKFDU[/video]
When I was a kid, my dad had a number of friends who played hockey in the Detroit area. None of em wore masks back then.
I don't remember many of them with a full set of teeth, either. But, it could have been just bad hygiene.
I remember him!