Touché.Same here!... that's why I never put anybody on ignore!
Used sarcastically to indicate that one is unable to argue against another's absurd logic.
Touché.Same here!... that's why I never put anybody on ignore!
Except for the mods they're all on ignore!Same here!... that's why I never put anybody on ignore!
back@ya'Yet everyday you discount themainstream media[Gateway Pundit] whether or not they could be true simply by the fact that they haven't been true in the past let me know how you justify that so then I can use the same response.
The surprising thing is I am consistent.back@ya'
False? Maybe not. Misleading and full of half truths? Oh hell yes. As an example we'll take this one.Yet you still haven't found one to be false. Of course you would have to open the link and read and we know how valuable your time is.
Strident, it's not just a flavor of gumThe surprising thing is I am consistent.
So maybe false maybe true. Go ahead you only have 29 more to go.False? Maybe not. Misleading and full of half truths? Oh hell yes. As an example we'll take this one.
Part V: Ventilators
18. Ventilation is NOT a treatment for respiratory viruses. Mechanical ventilation is not, and never has been, recommended treatment for respiratory infection of any kind.
That is not false. Ventilators are not a treatment for respiratory viruses. They are a treatment for the symptoms of respiratory viruses/infections. Opioids are not a treatment for severely broken bones, but they are a treatment for the pain they cause. Tylenol isn't a treatment for a sinus infection, but it can be a treatment for some of the symptoms/results of them such as sinus headaches and/or fever. A saline IV isn't going to treat dysentery, but it might stop you from dying of dehydration.
The same goes for quite a few medicines, they don't treat the cause they treat the effects.
Heck one of the Drs they cite (Strauss) uses intubation in Covid patients. He just cautions against over/unnecessary use.
Or how about this one.
"Experts estimate 40-50% of ventilated patients die, regardless of their disease."
Didn't check it, but I'm going to assume that it is correct and not false. But I'm guessing that generally the people who are put on ventilators are usually going to die without being put on one, those odds aren't bad. Look at defibrillators, about 30-50% of the time the person dies anyway. Does that mean they shouldn't be used?
Nah, true but very misleading. And you asked Fos if he had found one. I posted 2 so it would be 28 to go.So maybe false maybe true. Go ahead you only have 29 more to go.
All this, without masks or shutdowns.
You ever think it's one guy or gal with multiple screen names in all these vaccine/virus threads?I would put you on "ignore" but it's too much fun messing with you.
My kids' school district went to a mask mandate about two weeks after classes started, so mid-August. Somehow I doubt the drop in numbers will lead them to drop the masks anytime soon. Especially considering they haven't been willing to share what metrics they used to make the decision in the first place, or what metrics will be used to decide when they'd be willing to drop it.Delta in Indiana appears to be going away.
We are on the down-hill side for positives, death and hospitalizations.
Deaths never got anywhere near level they were during the December surge. By way of comparison, in early late August/September 2021, we hit an daily positive case # of about 5,000 at that time, there were daily deaths of about 20-30.
When we had about 5,000 daily cases in December (with a much higher peak), we had around 100 deaths per day.
Likewise, in late December, we had around 3,000 hospitalizations, but in late August/Early September 2021, around 2,000, but keeping in mind they were admitting anyone who wanted admittance in late summer of this year. This was not the case in December 2020.
In sum, everything is looking good and getting better.
Delta, of course, was related to a surge in cases, but a comparatively weak increase in serious cases and death, likely for 4 primary reasons: the otherwise sickest people most at risk...are already dead, Delta is more easily spread but not more severe, there are better treatments, and vaccines- particularly in the most vulnerable populations shift the infection rate to overall healthier people and make "breakthrough" cases less severe.
All this, without masks or shutdowns.
Yeah. I feel for you. For kids, especially young kids, compliance will be nearly impossible to enforce. It just makes everyone uncomfortable. Also, at this point, I would think there would be more definitive evidence that masks make a profound difference...if such evidence existed.My kids' school district went to a mask mandate about two weeks after classes started, so mid-August. Somehow I doubt the drop in numbers will lead them to drop the masks anytime soon. Especially considering they haven't been willing to share what metrics they used to make the decision in the first place, or what metrics will be used to decide when they'd be willing to drop it.
Basically, the new superintendent decided on a Friday afternoon that she was going to require masks for all students across the district (Hamilton Southeastern). No public comment, no board vote.
As far as I can tell, no one has any idea what the numbers would have to drop to before she allows kids to ditch the masks.
My kids' school district went to a mask mandate about two weeks after classes started, so mid-August. Somehow I doubt the drop in numbers will lead them to drop the masks anytime soon. Especially considering they haven't been willing to share what metrics they used to make the decision in the first place, or what metrics will be used to decide when they'd be willing to drop it.
Basically, the new superintendent decided on a Friday afternoon that she was going to require masks for all students across the district (Hamilton Southeastern). No public comment, no board vote.
As far as I can tell, no one has any idea what the numbers would have to drop to before she allows kids to ditch the masks.
Thanks. I sent emails directly to the Superintendent and via the district contact form when the announcement was made but never got any type of response or even an acknowledgement that it had been received.I can help draft a letter when I'm off work, but this is the way to get this information.
Public Records Requests - Hamilton Southeastern Schools
www.hseschools.org
Email all requests to Emily Pace-Abbotts
Wife works for that district. She can’t wear a mask all day due to severe asthma and the restriction on her ability to breathe. She wears a face shield instead. She’s had students pulled over it. That district has been virtue signaling for some time. Last summer she was made to read “growing up white” and give something she was ashamed for because she was white. This is no different than the mask mandates.My kids' school district went to a mask mandate about two weeks after classes started, so mid-August. Somehow I doubt the drop in numbers will lead them to drop the masks anytime soon. Especially considering they haven't been willing to share what metrics they used to make the decision in the first place, or what metrics will be used to decide when they'd be willing to drop it.
Basically, the new superintendent decided on a Friday afternoon that she was going to require masks for all students across the district (Hamilton Southeastern). No public comment, no board vote.
As far as I can tell, no one has any idea what the numbers would have to drop to before she allows kids to ditch the masks.