Cool! Now do claims by the CDCA claim of 30 facts is a strong claim. Only one needs to be wrong to discount the entire article.
Cool! Now do claims by the CDCA claim of 30 facts is a strong claim. Only one needs to be wrong to discount the entire article.
Dr Faustus, he had to change the name when it was too German for sentiment in the 40sWhat kind of deal with the devil did that guy make, I don't think people realize he's 80.
This is the lady largely responsible for the success of mRNA. Katalina Koriko'. I'd be surprised if she isn't up for a Nobel prize next year.I have no idea if this is true but I have read that he wants to be credited with a vaccine after his years and years of failure to create one for HIV. Some think it likely is personal desperation that drives him...
Not true. That kind of all-or-nothing thinking would sure not work well in research.A claim of 30 facts is a strong claim. Only one needs to be wrong to discount the entire article.
Why? Nobody posts CDC claims, at least not over and over enough to get my attention. And I have yet to see anyone that does so ask anyone to dispute themCool! Now do claims by the CDC
My time is more valuable than that. If someone is wants to claim 30 facts to be true and I find one of them false, I'm not going to try and figure out which ones of the rest are not true especially when they occur in an article with no sources.Not true. That kind of all-or-nothing thinking would sure not work well in research.
Kind of like throwing out the baby with the bath water.
Yet you still haven't found one to be false. Of course you would have to open the link and read and we know how valuable your time is.My time is more valuable than that. If someone is wants to claim 30 facts to be true and I find one of them false, I'm not going to try and figure out which ones of the rest are not true especially when they occur in an article with no sources.
Basic logic dictates that if there are 30 claim true statements in which one of them is false then the whole statement is false
I wanted to see if you were Kutsistent in your claim that one wrong assertion out of 30 would be enough to call them all into questionWhy? Nobody posts CDC claims, at least not over and over enough to get my attention. And I have yet to see anyone that does so ask anyone to dispute them
So your claim is that post 3931 which you posted the entire text is different than the link you posted?Yet you still haven't found one to be false. Of course you would have to open the link and read and we know how valuable your time is.
If they post a 30 claims in one document and one of them was false then yeah absolutelyI wanted to see if you were Kutsistent in your claim that one wrong assertion out of 30 would be enough to call them all into question
Only if it is claimed that all terms are joined by the logical AND, if it is A1 U A2 ... U A30, then not so muchBasic logic dictates that if there are 30 claim true statements in which one of them is false then the whole statement is false
What about an organization that makes more than 30 claims in one pandemic and WAY more than one of them is false?If they post a 30 claims in one document and one of them was false then yeah absolutely
Fiat falsificationYet you still haven't found one to be false. Of course you would have to open the link and read and we know how valuable your time is.
If you saw a fact about covid that was facing itself on a 2020 March study, would you question whether or not there was more up-to-date data or would you just accept it?What about an organization that makes more than 30 claims in one pandemic and WAY more than one of them is false?
Your version of "logic" is faulty. You seem to be trying to make a conjunction out of a list of 30 disjunctive facts. Your statement is false therefore, by your "logic", everything you say is false.Basic logic dictates that if there are 30 claim true statements in which one of them is false then the whole statement is false
Yet everyday you discount the mainstream media whether or not they could be true simply by the fact that they haven't been true in the past let me know how you justify that so then I can use the same response.Your version of "logic" is faulty. You seem to be trying to make a conjunction out of a list of 30 disjunctive facts. Your statement is false therefore, by your "logic", everything you say is false.
I guess I'll have to find a meme so that you can understand a very simple question and answer it
I would put you on "ignore" but it's too much fun messing with you.I guess I'll have to find a meme so that you can understand a very simple question and answer it
Same here!... that's why I never put anybody on ignore!I would put you on "ignore" but it's too much fun messing with you.