This is one of the best reasons why. Although I was raised to care for the firearm before myself, so clean weapons, then yourselfI tend to clean my 1911s after each range trip but only because it gives me a chance to fondle them about bit more after a range trip.
Depending on what ammo you are running through them I would say no.
"But"......Always a but, look in the chamber and see how cruddy the barrel/ramp etc. is and possibly just wipe it off.
Do you remember how I lubed up the slide and the difference before and after...???
That gun was set up after the Ceracote so it is slick and ready to run. Keep the rails wet.
I got some of that lube and used it after I took it to Atterbury and cleaned it. Seems smooth and ready to go.
Looks very similar. How do you find it compared to the Springfield CM?
I was thinking, after I save up, about a Ruger for my next one.
Put 500/700 through it and you will know exactly what you have.
Cheap dirty ammo will show faults sooner than mid grade or good reloads.
In the tough training classes your equipment will be tested.
More of a general statement for the masses.
So many gun owners just never "Run" their guns and when they do it is not run hard.
Folks saying they have never experienced an issue with the gun they shoot and when asked how they run them the round count is 50 to 150 total spread out over 3 or 4 range trips. No issues with this but that is not a test.
Yes it does and is one of the reasons some folks limit range time.
A tight budget will dictate where the funds go.
You are so right. It is amazing how people can come to a class with a gun they "have never had a problem with", and somehow it goes down the toilet in a two day class. Most recently it was a Kimber in a Tom Givens class I helped out with, but it can and does happen to a lot of models.
I'm in the process of deciding to go back to 1911s full time and the specter of ammo costs is looming in my mind. My guns used to be very reliable under tough conditions over tens of thousands of rounds, but they haven't been shot in a while. I'll need to vet all of them with both FMJ and carry ammo before returning them to self-defense role and it's going to be a more intensive evaluation that is required for a Glock or a Sig!
That sure is pretty. I am thinking just a basic one for traveling in the future. However, still have to start looking for a new 38 for the wife.
I wouldn't worry too much about it if they were solid before. I got my open gun out a little last year for the first time in several years. I hadn't cleaned it before I put it away, so it had 5k rounds worth of crud that had dried out and caked in there. ugh. I was expecting to have to do some TLC, but it just ran just as well as it did before. maybe could have used a little tweak for some more extractor tension, but that's more a function of being run hard before it was put away, not so much the sitting, imo...
worst case, replace couple springs...
-rvb
Ordinarily I'd agree with you. Unfortunately I shot my Kimber Eclipse a couple of years ago in an IDPA classifier match. I haven't had time to diagnose it, but with 200 gr LSWC, it had some very odd problems. That will be the gun that will get the first look-see.
Uh....1st it is a Kimber.
I keed I keed.....
Hehe! Good point!
It served well for about 25K rounds when it was my primary USPSA and training gun. I'm pretty sure it was a Wednesday and not a Monday or Friday gun because it was reliable and very smooth cycling. The original hammer and sear (both MIM) lasted through all of that, then the hammer started following at about 25K. I replaced with a cylinder & slide drop-in kit.
I have a Springfield lightweight Champion that doesn't like 230gr Gold Dots if you want to take a look at it . . . it would be a sweet carry gun -- if it worked!
Lets look at it over a double bacon cheese burger...