When I was stationed in Louisiana I had to complete a training course to obtain a carry license.
I think all states should have a training requirement it was only like 8 hours but it covered the basics.
Get this if you did not qualify you didn't pass about 4 out of about 15 didn't make the cut!
I think I am going to OC carry my 4in nickel M19 in an ankle holster !
When I was stationed in Louisiana I had to complete a training course to obtain a carry license.
I think all states should have a training requirement it was only like 8 hours but it covered the basics.
Get this if you did not qualify you didn't pass about 4 out of about 15 didn't make the cut!
I think I am going to OC carry my 4in nickel M19 in an ankle holster !
So a hunter education course is OK but a training course to carry a concealed weapon is not?
I get the whole right to bear arms thing but you have some real "winners" carrying.
How many of us feel comfortable with completely untrained person carrying a firearm?
Then we see incidents of AD/ND and say "they didn't adhere to the four rules" because they didn't know them!
Gun guys criticizing other gun guys based on a foto with no facts.
Welcome to INGO!
If it works for him,....
I thought you were a lawyer?
"If it works for him," is a conditional hyposthesis.
If it works for him, who should criticize it? If he can only afford to carry what he has in that foto, why would that elicit "elitist" comments from 2A defenders?
Hypocritical.
I've seen the calvary twist used in competition by very good shooters. It was effective for them. I doubt that I would ever use it.
One currently supported by no facts. I was actually thinking that he moved the holster from the left to the right because it was hitting the person or chair next to him...I find that as much more likely than "work for him", as that would imply that a more orthodox carry method does not "work for him" better.
I'd be real careful throwing the "hypocritical" term around. I'm sure I could dig up some posts you've made criticizing others without all the facts. I mean, I'm sure you'd never decide what an LEO should or should not do based solely on a media account, make broad sweeping statements about Christians, or criticize the appearance of a woman online. Right?
So, did any of those very good shooters use a reverse cant tight to the body that far back on the strong side? Or did they actually use a holster designed for such? Was it a competition with single action revolvers were you pretend to be a cowboy and dress the same? IE, a drop holster with a straight or slightly muzzle forward cant and plenty of room to get your knuckles in behind the gun? Was there a retention strap?
Best he can afford? A right handed holster Uncle Mike's sausage sack costs more than a left handed?
It's not elitest to point out this is a terrible way to carry a gun for self defense.
So a hunter education course is OK but a training course to carry a concealed weapon is not?
I get the whole right to bear arms thing but you have some real "winners" carrying.
How many of us feel comfortable with completely untrained person carrying a firearm?
Then we see incidents of AD/ND and say "they didn't adhere to the four rules" because they didn't know them!
Edited to fill in the blanks. There is nothing quick or efficient in this method and choice of firearm.I'd be fascinated to see the fact pattern that makes reverse cant cavalry draw with a 1911 with the hammer downa smart way to carry.