What would a normal number of cycles be on a typical PCR test?Some we’re running 100 cycles.
What would a normal number of cycles be on a typical PCR test?Some we’re running 100 cycles.
CDC issued this guidance a few days after the election. Without digging, and going from memory only I believe it was suggested to be 30-35What would a normal number of cycles be on a typical PCR test?
VAERS reports around 1,250 deaths and 24000 vaccine adverse reactions. The PCR test is flawed and the CDC cannot produce a viable sample of what said virus actually looks like. The vaccine is totally experimental and does not qualify vaccine or as insurable hazard. Death benefits are being denied if vaccine is deemed the cause.So you want to see how many croak from it first!. Good call.......
As of a few days ago there were 966 deaths reported to VAERS according to The Epoch Times.VAERS reports around 1,250 deaths and 24000 vaccine adverse reactions. The PCR test is flawed and the CDC cannot produce a viable sample of what said virus actually looks like. The vaccine is totally experimental and does not qualify vaccine or as insurable hazard. Death benefits are being denied if vaccine is deemed the cause.
Portugal is suing over PCR test inaccuracies and stopped vaccine until further study over 40 nursing home residents dying within days of vaccine. Which does not qualify as a vaccine..As of a few days ago there were 966 deaths reported to VAERS according to The Epoch Times.
472 after Moderna injections 489 after Pfizer.
FWIW there have been ZERO deaths reported where the vaccine is the cause of death. VAERS data is investigated on a case by case basis. People who die at some point in time after receiving the vaccine may have died from old age, from other health issues, etc. so just to be clear, what is reported as an issues may ultimately be found to not be an issue.
As for adverse reaction, even a sore shoulder or fatigue for a day after the vaccination are counted as adverse reactions.
The raw numbers, when studied, are not scary. Spreading them out of context is very misleading.
Portugal is suing over PCR test inaccuracies and stopped vaccine until further study over 40 nursing home residents dying within days of vaccine. Which does not qualify as a vaccine..
Portugal signed contracts for several vaccines which are not even legal in the US or CanadaPortugal is suing over PCR test inaccuracies and stopped vaccine until further study over 40 nursing home residents dying within days of vaccine. Which does not qualify as a vaccine..
That and Portugal is apparently a nation with modern medicine? Last time I was over there it was the paragon of underfunded socialized medicine in a nation that is only a few steps ahead of some of the 3rd world nations.Don't "qualify as a vaccine"....oh boy.
So, one way or another, you're getting the vaccine.This morning I went in for a blood draw 2+ weeks after my second shot of placebo or vaccine. They told me that they were starting a "blinded crossover" which, although it sounds like a 3 meter dive, is where they give everyone who originally got the placebo the vaccine and everyone who originally got the vaccine a placebo. They will be scheduling over the next several weeks.
Correct. They want to get everyone through the visit I just had- the one where the measure antibodies and other immunity factors 2+ weeks after the second dose and far enough out to be after the time for reactions, which is only the 1st week. Then, I think there becomes an ethical issue with knowingly not giving a vaccine and "encouraging" trial participants not to be vaccinated otherwise. Although it's not a huge ethical issue as we all knowingly signed on for that possibility and we can drop out at any time if we want to.So, one way or another, you're getting the vaccine.
Interesting.
You can drop out anytime, but microchip stays put.Correct. They want to get everyone through the visit I just had- the one where the measure antibodies and other immunity factors 2+ weeks after the second dose and far enough out to be after the time for reactions, which is only the 1st week. Then, I think there becomes an ethical issue with knowingly not giving a vaccine and "encouraging" trial participants not to be vaccinated otherwise. Although it's not a huge ethical issue as we all knowingly signed on for that possibility and we can drop out at any time if we want to.
Vaccine is defined as a weakened bacteria or virus. This is a DNA altering protein synthesis MRna vaccine that does not meet the criteria of a "vaccine". We are not being told the long term effects, because we are being told studies haven't been done. Doctors Virologists by the numbers are coming out against taking the jab. Robert Kennedy Jr. Appointed to Trump's administration is speaking out against this. Children's Health Foundation is where I think you can find him. John Rappaport at Nomorefakenews.com has been speaking against vaccines for many decades.Don't "qualify as a vaccine"....oh boy.
No its not. That is only one type of vaccine. There have been other types for some time.Vaccine is defined as a weakened bacteria or virus.
Is it? Or is that "just how it's always been done."?Vaccine is defined as a weakened bacteria or virus. This is a DNA altering protein synthesis MRna vaccine that does not meet the criteria of a "vaccine". We are not being told the long term effects, because we are being told studies haven't been done. Doctors Virologists by the numbers are coming out against taking the jab. Robert Kennedy Jr. Appointed to Trump's administration is speaking out against this. Children's Health Foundation is where I think you can find him. John Rappaport at Nomorefakenews.com has been speaking against vaccines for many decades.
Just curious. What was is the placebo? I doubt it's just saline. Maybe a different vaccine. The reason I wonder about that, if you have a reaction that people often get with vaccines, that would ruin the reason they use placebos. You'd have a really good reason to believe you got the real thing. So, maybe give you a flu shot as the placebo instead.This morning I went in for a blood draw 2+ weeks after my second shot of placebo or vaccine. They told me that they were starting a "blinded crossover" which, although it sounds like a 3 meter dive, is where they give everyone who originally got the placebo the vaccine and everyone who originally got the vaccine a placebo. They will be scheduling over the next several weeks.
It is saline. That is what it says in the 28 page informed consent form. I have read some things about using other vaccines for the placebo for just those reasons, but in this case, it's saline.Just curious. What was is the placebo? I doubt it's just saline. Maybe a different vaccine. The reason I wonder about that, if you have a reaction that people often get with vaccines, that would ruin the reason they use placebos. You'd have a really good reason to believe you got the real thing. So, maybe give you a flu shot as the placebo instead.