Standard format of a pro 2A letter that his office sends anyone and everyone.... and still full of lies.
That is what I think also. Political BS from a guy that has been tell us falsehood since 1977. I am happy he is gone come next year.
Standard format of a pro 2A letter that his office sends anyone and everyone.... and still full of lies.
That is what I think also. Political BS from a guy that has been tell us falsehood since 1977. I am happy he is gone come next year.
I doubt if any of our representatives ever see any of our correspondence. Their secretaries take care of that. Only something extreme would get to them I think.
BUT - we still need to contact them (various methods) FOR THE RECORD.
Probably, but only if it works for the benefit of their political agenda.
Arms may fairly easily purchased for export through companies operated out of China, France, Russia, UK, and the U.S.[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]Coincidentally, these countries that manufacture the largest number of both small and large arms, are also the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council.
I've heard that last part in a movie.
This treaty has not been signed. It does not have the support needed in the Senate if it was signed. If it does get signed but does not get approved by the Senate (needs 2/3 majority) then it does not have the force of law. This is all from high school civics/government class. Apparently, we have very few members here that did not sleep through those classes.
This thread has so much fail and ignorance in it that it made my head hurt.
I am going to go lie down now.
Me three.That's change I can believe in.
Did you forget the great number of times Dictator Obama has ignored Congress (yeah, that included the Senate) and did just what HE wanted? What makes you think that he would even bother with them - especially if he thinks they would vote it down? Obama doesn't do Constitution!
This treaty has not been signed. It does not have the support needed in the Senate if it was signed. If it does get signed but does not get approved by the Senate (needs 2/3 majority) then it does not have the force of law. This is all from high school civics/government class. Apparently, we have very few members here that did not sleep through those classes.
This thread has so much fail and ignorance in it that it made my head hurt.
I am going to go lie down now.
Once Hilary signs it, we are just that much closer...then all it it would take is a liberal majority and we're done...irreversal damage. Can anybody say "New World Order"?
Here's some info from the NRA on the treaty....The NRA has made clear its opposition to any treaty that includes civilian firearms, and continues to note that a majority of the United States Senate stands with American gun owners in opposition to such a treaty. We have led the effort to mobilize opposition to the treaty in Congress, and not only a bipartisan majority of the U.S. Senate, but also 130 House members, have voiced strong opposition to the treaty. Ignoring that reality, U.N. conferees are working to regulate not only civilian small arms, but also ammunition and firearm parts...
You need to be a little more specific because all I see is a ****-poor rant on your part. He doesn't have a majority in the House and lacks the 2/3 majority in the Senate to do much of anything except use the veto. You need to go somewhere, get educated and try dealing in reality not Tea Party propaganda.
As I said, the fail is huge in this thread. Thanks for confirming that.
Your quote tag in English is: "It is best to endure what you cannot change." I prefer: Improvise, Adapt, Overcome or, "Compone Accomoda Supera"That's change I can believe in.
Exactly "how" good are they planning?Obviously enough of them changed their minds for our own good
Was not aware of this...looking a bit dismal...voting booths need to be the avenue to extract the mess in D.C.I haven't had time to research this but Dick Morris said it doesn't matter if it's ratified, which it would be at the current count of senators that support it. However, if it's signed, it doesn't have to be ratified if Harry Reid doesn't bring it up for a vote. The U.S. would be bound by it if it's signed and waiting for a vote. So, if it's signed at the end of the month like its expected to be and Obama gets re-elected then we would be bound by it for the next 4 years and 4 months.
If I could applaud you, I would...very sensible...I want to remind you of Nazi Germany...Hitler picked off his opponents one at a time...and everyone watched cause hitler wasn't coming for them...and when it finally got to the last one, when he looked around for help, he had none because Hitler had gotten them all. I do agree with what you said, but I suspect we need to keep alert and vigilant, and not assume anything...but do be prepared for everything. Best way to do that is to consider all options and avenues...including the "Chicken Little's"I can respect being mindful of what slides across the desks in Washington but after spectating much of the mindless babble regarding this UN Small Arms Treaty it's nearly become a laughing matter. From what I've seen, people are behaving as if all is lost and the end is near. Many media outlets have been exaggerating it, it's become a business edge for many weapons dealers (I don't blame them for it), and the usual response is the typical "they can have my gun when they pry it from my cold dead hands" or "I'll be cocked and locked when they come knockin' for my guns". It's humiliating personally because that kind of behavior sums up the crazed gun owner stereotype. It all boils down to fear mongering which doesn't help anything. I never sat through the entire Nutnfancy video but I'm sure its up to par with what I'm mentioning. I love my firearms, I love my rights, I love having access to exercise both, but I also do my best to understand what the government can and can't do and this is something that is far beyond reality. Could it effect us? Perhaps to a certain level but this isn't the death of guns. Maybe I'm a naive college student who doesn't see the fear but we have checks and balances for a purpose, they haven't always held up the best in past history but they do their part.
Your nearest local back alley...seriously, I think this might be getting a bit ahead of where we actually are...All the gun people could come up here to Alaska and we could have a great time being a country all our own...actually, while Alaska has great gun laws, most gun owners would not want to deal with the rest of the B.S.if they ban small arms, where might one purchase large ones instead???
And their U.N. representatives are pushing hard for the same goal...Arms may fairly easily purchased for export through companies operated out of China, France, Russia, UK, and the U.S.[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]Coincidentally, these countries that manufacture the largest number of both small and large arms, are also the 5 permanent members of the UN Security Council.