Hold on there…I didn’t say the instigators (even any potential agent provocateurs) should not be held accountable for their role in motivating the crowd…I said the crowd shouldn’t have fallen for the instigator’s tactics.
I have no idea what a “glowie” is either...but that’s nothing new, INGO lingo often escapes me, lol.
There's a lot you didn't say. Like, you didn't connect any dots. You just said it's self evident as if it's instinctive to believe all Trump has to do is identify a target and they just know what to do. You just claimed that J6 was most obvious, when I don't see anything obvious about it. What I heard was Trump telling people to protest peacefully.
That’s fair, I don’t expect you to take my word for anything.
Personally, I think it’s self-evident that a some percentage of Trump’s supporters would act against Trump’s accusers whether or not he overtly orders them to. We have seen countless examples thus far, with Jan6 being the most obvious…and most worrisome…example.
What is most obvious about it? Given this, why should I think that this is only an issue of instinct driven by world view? And I suppose you could say the same thing to me, and fair enough. But either way, your claim is still short on receipts.
Last edited: