Trump says he's not sure if Rand Paul voted for Iraq war.
The vote was in 2002. Paul took office in 2011.
Rand Paul doesn't believe in war. He's a Librarian.
Trump says he's not sure if Rand Paul voted for Iraq war.
The vote was in 2002. Paul took office in 2011.
I thought Rand was at just under 3% in the combined poll. Kasich was under 2%. Why was Rand disinvited?
I think this is a mistake. It may not be the audience you wanted but I think you should take the opportunity to spread your message to whomever you get a chance. At least in the undercard debate, with only 4 candidates, he might get time to better fill out his points rather than try to pry time out of the moderators and coming across as a bit petty like he's been known to do so far.
Personally, I'd like to see them limit the main event to the top 4.
Well, that's Rand, and that's why he's under 3%. He seems kinda snobby.
I could see why people would think this.
He comes off as an elite snob and that turns voters off.
To me, Rand has the right ideas about government and how to govern. He just doesn't have the temperament for it. He comes off as an elite snob and that turns voters off.
If that's how Paul is being described, I have no idea how to put Trump into words.
Sometimes it's not what you say but how you say it. Trump's schtick is more akin to throwing populist, red meat out to crowd. Paul comes across a bit too snarky many times for general consumption. While I agree with a great many of his positions, many of them are not understood too well by less wonky types like those of us that spend a lot of time discussing political issues. He comes across, to me, as someone that assumes everybody else should have already thought these issues through--he doesn't do a good job making his case and bringing people over to his side.
Honestly, everybody should have thought these issue through. He just can't hide his frustration with general idiocracy, lol, of the electorate.
They are products of who they are. Trump came up dealing with contractors, unions, etc. So he is use to talking tough, taking far out positions as part of negotiations, blunt talk, etc. Paul is a doctor, so he is used to explaining to patients that he knows what he is doing and to just trust him. Two very different skill sets.Sometimes it's not what you say but how you say it. Trump's schtick is more akin to throwing populist, red meat out to crowd. Paul comes across a bit too snarky many times for general consumption. While I agree with a great many of his positions, many of them are not understood too well by less wonky types like those of us that spend a lot of time discussing political issues. He comes across, to me, as someone that assumes everybody else should have already thought these issues through--he doesn't do a good job making his case and bringing people over to his side.
Honestly, everybody should have thought these issue through. He just can't hide his frustration with general idiocracy, lol, of the electorate.
A good politician understands the "idiocracy" of the electorate and properly exploits them. It's why the two leading candidates are The Donald and Hillary.
They are products of who they are. Trump came up dealing with contractors, unions, etc. So he is use to talking tough, taking far out positions as part of negotiations, blunt talk, etc. Paul is a doctor, so he is used to explaining to patients that he knows what he is doing and to just trust him. Two very different skill sets.